please help me with this, I don't understand and where to get sources from
Illustrate the ethical and legal preparations required for successful prosecution of a case.
Research the various crimes discussed in this course and the techniques used to investigate those crimes.
Choose at least 2 specific offenses (Homicide, Arson, Burglary, etc.)
Consult at least 2 research sources
http://investigatorcourse.com
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Can you help me with the legal aid as I'm trying to build a lawsuit and defense for a friends court case?
Theres A false picture being painted of whats really happened and slander as well as defimation of charactor according to the charges being instated and accused of and I'm financially strapped! So I'm needing as much help/input as possible to be solid with proceeding into this matter !Can you help me with the legal aid as I'm trying to build a lawsuit and defense for a friends court case?
What state are you in? What do you mean by charges? If it's a criminal case and your friend cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for him (public defender).
If you're in CA and the ';slander'; and or ';defamation'; was told to a police officer, during the course of an investigation, then your friend can't win. A recent case came out that said those statements are covered by Civil Code 47 (or 45) - the litigation privilege.Can you help me with the legal aid as I'm trying to build a lawsuit and defense for a friends court case?
Im sorry you are dealing with this issue. You need Pre-Paid Legal Services
Look in the Blue Pages of your phone book at home.
Websites like FindLaw, LawGuru are some of the free legal advice resources available. More information at http://www.uelp.org/freelegal.htmleye look
What state are you in? What do you mean by charges? If it's a criminal case and your friend cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for him (public defender).
If you're in CA and the ';slander'; and or ';defamation'; was told to a police officer, during the course of an investigation, then your friend can't win. A recent case came out that said those statements are covered by Civil Code 47 (or 45) - the litigation privilege.Can you help me with the legal aid as I'm trying to build a lawsuit and defense for a friends court case?
Im sorry you are dealing with this issue. You need Pre-Paid Legal Services
Look in the Blue Pages of your phone book at home.
Websites like FindLaw, LawGuru are some of the free legal advice resources available. More information at http://www.uelp.org/freelegal.html
Is it legal to bribe someone to testify in a civil case?
This company my sister in law and my self used to work for asked me to testify against my sister in law in a civil case she has against them. They said ';we will compensate you if you testify against her in court. '; Is this legal?Is it legal to bribe someone to testify in a civil case?
Well, yes, it is just a paid witness. Although the other attorney will question you as to whether you were ';paid'; to be there, and that can ruin your credibility, as well as the fact that you are her sister, unless you believe you should go with the company instead of her, you might want to keep yourself out of it unless subpeona'd to testify.Is it legal to bribe someone to testify in a civil case?
YES
Nah! They are just saying that they will pay your expenses, airfare, lost wages or whatever it costs you to attend. If you were an expert witness, they could pay you also. If they subpoena you, they will have to pay your expenses. But if they are offering to bribe you, that is illegal and I'll bet they never try.
depends on what they mean by 'compinsate' they are either allowed, or required to repay any expenses you incur as a result of you making yourself available to testify. (rooms, airfare, transportation) or any wages you might lose during the time that you are required to be available to the court. anything other than that is bribery or witness tampering and probably a couple of other felonies that I can't remember the names for right now.
If they are paying you to appear and tell the truth, then it's legal, but the fact that you are being paid might be considered to be germane to your testimony. (Meaning that the jury can consider the fact that you were paid to be there when they weigh your testimony, should that fact that you are being paid to appear be disclosed in court.)
If they are paying you to give false testimony, then they are guilty of obstruction of justice even if you refuse their offer. (And you would be guilty of conspiracy if you accepted, and also guilty of perjury if you went through with it and testified falsely.) Although, in a civil case, it's possible that a summary judgment would be issued against them for doing so rather than referring charges for criminal prosecution.
If they offered to pay you for giving evidence, this constitutes the very serious crime of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Of course you must report the matter. Make sure you have evidence, though, in case they claim that you asked them for compensation. These people sound nasty.
Make sure too that they weren't simply saying that they would pay your expenses. This would be permitted by law.
Unless you are being asked to commit PERJURY and lie under oath, it is not illegal to compensate you for testifying. Doctors are paid to testify in civil court cases every day. If however you are ASKED by the other attorney if you're being compensated for testifying, you have to admit that you are or else you are committing perjury and could go to jail for it.
It's not a bribe unless they offer to pay you to testify falsely.
Witnesses in civil trials are frequently compensated for their time and travel expenses.
You don't have any choice, by the way, in whether you will testify or not. If you refuse to testify voluntarily, they can subpoena you, and you must attend. If you refuse to answer questions you can be charged with contempt of court, and if you lie, you can be charged with perjury.
Richard
Uh of course it's illegal. If you are caught you could face charges.
Ok, take a small voice recorder with you and PLEASE record their offer of bribery. Then you know what to do next. Enough.
Since you haven't specified what they mean by ';compensate'; (and perhaps you don't know), it is possible that they are somewhat misleading you.
In many states, if not all, witnesses who are subpoenaed to testify in court are paid a witness and mileage fee to appear. This is legal, as it is required by state law. Where I live, the witness fee is $20.00, and you are paid $0.20 per mile round trip.
It's possible that this company was simply trying to entice you to testify by saying that they would paid for you to come there, when in reality they are required to do so. Deceptive, perhaps, but not illegal.
Well, yes, it is just a paid witness. Although the other attorney will question you as to whether you were ';paid'; to be there, and that can ruin your credibility, as well as the fact that you are her sister, unless you believe you should go with the company instead of her, you might want to keep yourself out of it unless subpeona'd to testify.Is it legal to bribe someone to testify in a civil case?
YES
Nah! They are just saying that they will pay your expenses, airfare, lost wages or whatever it costs you to attend. If you were an expert witness, they could pay you also. If they subpoena you, they will have to pay your expenses. But if they are offering to bribe you, that is illegal and I'll bet they never try.
depends on what they mean by 'compinsate' they are either allowed, or required to repay any expenses you incur as a result of you making yourself available to testify. (rooms, airfare, transportation) or any wages you might lose during the time that you are required to be available to the court. anything other than that is bribery or witness tampering and probably a couple of other felonies that I can't remember the names for right now.
If they are paying you to appear and tell the truth, then it's legal, but the fact that you are being paid might be considered to be germane to your testimony. (Meaning that the jury can consider the fact that you were paid to be there when they weigh your testimony, should that fact that you are being paid to appear be disclosed in court.)
If they are paying you to give false testimony, then they are guilty of obstruction of justice even if you refuse their offer. (And you would be guilty of conspiracy if you accepted, and also guilty of perjury if you went through with it and testified falsely.) Although, in a civil case, it's possible that a summary judgment would be issued against them for doing so rather than referring charges for criminal prosecution.
If they offered to pay you for giving evidence, this constitutes the very serious crime of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Of course you must report the matter. Make sure you have evidence, though, in case they claim that you asked them for compensation. These people sound nasty.
Make sure too that they weren't simply saying that they would pay your expenses. This would be permitted by law.
Unless you are being asked to commit PERJURY and lie under oath, it is not illegal to compensate you for testifying. Doctors are paid to testify in civil court cases every day. If however you are ASKED by the other attorney if you're being compensated for testifying, you have to admit that you are or else you are committing perjury and could go to jail for it.
It's not a bribe unless they offer to pay you to testify falsely.
Witnesses in civil trials are frequently compensated for their time and travel expenses.
You don't have any choice, by the way, in whether you will testify or not. If you refuse to testify voluntarily, they can subpoena you, and you must attend. If you refuse to answer questions you can be charged with contempt of court, and if you lie, you can be charged with perjury.
Richard
Uh of course it's illegal. If you are caught you could face charges.
Ok, take a small voice recorder with you and PLEASE record their offer of bribery. Then you know what to do next. Enough.
Since you haven't specified what they mean by ';compensate'; (and perhaps you don't know), it is possible that they are somewhat misleading you.
In many states, if not all, witnesses who are subpoenaed to testify in court are paid a witness and mileage fee to appear. This is legal, as it is required by state law. Where I live, the witness fee is $20.00, and you are paid $0.20 per mile round trip.
It's possible that this company was simply trying to entice you to testify by saying that they would paid for you to come there, when in reality they are required to do so. Deceptive, perhaps, but not illegal.
I was put on un-paided leave from company i worked for due to a Ammonia Leak,have i got a legal case??
You left out many details, so I will try to tackle the possibilities I see:
1. For the time off from work because the plant is closed - No, not at all. They are only required to pay you for the time you work.
2. Time off from work because you were suspended for causing the leak. Same as 1
3. You were injured because of the leak. Perhaps. depends on the situation.
If you are out of work while the plant is shut down, you can file for unemployment.I was put on un-paided leave from company i worked for due to a Ammonia Leak,have i got a legal case??
If it happened at work then file for Workers Compensation. If he does not pay into the program then you can sue him for compensation due to your work related injuries.
If this did not happen at work then he can do pretty much what he wants. I was put on un-paided leave from company i worked for due to a Ammonia Leak,have i got a legal case??
No. I'm afraid that that doesn't sound like any kind of legal case to me.
If you are not re-instated within a week or two, though, then you could file for a loss of income...
you probably qualify for state unemployment . if you breathed the ammonia and sufferd damage (med bills , lung damage ) you got a lawyers wet dream .
case for what ?
They have no work for you. They laid you off.
Either wait for them to get things fixed or find a new job.
What do you think you could sue for ? geeez
1. For the time off from work because the plant is closed - No, not at all. They are only required to pay you for the time you work.
2. Time off from work because you were suspended for causing the leak. Same as 1
3. You were injured because of the leak. Perhaps. depends on the situation.
If you are out of work while the plant is shut down, you can file for unemployment.I was put on un-paided leave from company i worked for due to a Ammonia Leak,have i got a legal case??
If it happened at work then file for Workers Compensation. If he does not pay into the program then you can sue him for compensation due to your work related injuries.
If this did not happen at work then he can do pretty much what he wants. I was put on un-paided leave from company i worked for due to a Ammonia Leak,have i got a legal case??
No. I'm afraid that that doesn't sound like any kind of legal case to me.
If you are not re-instated within a week or two, though, then you could file for a loss of income...
you probably qualify for state unemployment . if you breathed the ammonia and sufferd damage (med bills , lung damage ) you got a lawyers wet dream .
case for what ?
They have no work for you. They laid you off.
Either wait for them to get things fixed or find a new job.
What do you think you could sue for ? geeez
Where can i find lawyer or legal advice to help me with a 407 small claims court case?
The 407 ETR is taking me to court over charges they said had accumulated 8 years ago but have no photographic evidence that it was my vehicle and i'm not clear on when 'discovery' takes place - how long do they have to make a claim in the small claims court. Any ideas to help my case, approaches, sources for defense, inexpensive legal assistance? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!!Where can i find lawyer or legal advice to help me with a 407 small claims court case?
Get this! They will walk you through the small claims process, step by step. You get a bunch of other stuff besides unlimited consultation. But it sounds like just what you need, and it is cheap, only $17 a month in my state and no long term contract or anything like that. www.getprotectedhere.comWhere can i find lawyer or legal advice to help me with a 407 small claims court case?
Contact a well versed attorney to guide you in this case.However I believe the statue may be unclear, depending on the state you reside. Don't go it alone you could end up paying higher fees just in a small claims division.Be smart get the facts of the case and find an attorney who will present it for you.Discovery takes place when it becomes a legal case ( law suite). LOL
Get this! They will walk you through the small claims process, step by step. You get a bunch of other stuff besides unlimited consultation. But it sounds like just what you need, and it is cheap, only $17 a month in my state and no long term contract or anything like that. www.getprotectedhere.comWhere can i find lawyer or legal advice to help me with a 407 small claims court case?
Contact a well versed attorney to guide you in this case.However I believe the statue may be unclear, depending on the state you reside. Don't go it alone you could end up paying higher fees just in a small claims division.Be smart get the facts of the case and find an attorney who will present it for you.Discovery takes place when it becomes a legal case ( law suite). LOL
Is it legal for a case to be dismissed in the middle of a custody evaluation?
Not enough info.Is it legal for a case to be dismissed in the middle of a custody evaluation?
depends on the issues. which you didn't provide.
depends on the issues. which you didn't provide.
Is there any type of low cost or free legal assistance for a minority single mother in child custody case?
Need any information regarding low cost or free legal assistance for a single hispanic Mother who is fighting for child custody for her two year old daughter, yet has been instructed to participate in items that she cannot financially afford, and her family also is drained too financially? Are there any assistant agencies, Funding/Grants per Federal and/or State for this woman of low income? She is on AFDC, and she and her child are just getting by etc. She also wants to put her two year old girl in school, however her ex husband has ptetitioned to comply, yet wants PRIMARY custody of the child.Is there any type of low cost or free legal assistance for a minority single mother in child custody case?
Is there a local collage that offers a law program, if so they usually have free legal advice program that helps the seniors get ready for the real world.eye look
Is there a local collage that offers a law program, if so they usually have free legal advice program that helps the seniors get ready for the real world.
What was the legal question at issue in the ';Obama birth certificate'; case denied by the Supreme Court?
The lower courts dismissed the suit, ruling that the candidate does not have to prove anything to every individual voter, in the form demanded by every voter. Instead, the candidate must prove his eligibility to the proper election officials of each state. The legal issue was whether the case was properly dismissed, not whether he is a citizen.What was the legal question at issue in the ';Obama birth certificate'; case denied by the Supreme Court?
The idea of natural born citizenship.
Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth -- his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject -- he cannot possibly be a ';natural born citizen,'; one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.
Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.
What was the legal question at issue in the ';Obama birth certificate'; case denied by the Supreme Court?
People think its fake, especially after it was confirmed to be authentic by both the Hawaiian Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino and the state's registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, say they checked health department records and have determined there's no doubt Obama was born in Hawaii.
He's black, he's American, and he's gonna be president. GET OVER IT EVERYONE!
he was actually born in the united States . Their is a birth certificate from Hawaii that proves he was born in USA in Hawaii . So all appeals will be not do anything , but blow a bunch of smoke .
IT`S A FORGERY FOR ONE. yOU CAN TELL THE COLOR OF IT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE OTHERS DONE ON THE SAME DAY EVEN ONES ON THE SAME 30 MINUTES OF TIME.IT`S BELIEVED THAT OBAM`AS PARENT HAD THE CERTIFICATE FAKED WHEN HE WAS 3 YEARS OLD.
He was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, last time I looked, that is a US state.
The idea of natural born citizenship.
Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth -- his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject -- he cannot possibly be a ';natural born citizen,'; one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.
Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.
What was the legal question at issue in the ';Obama birth certificate'; case denied by the Supreme Court?
People think its fake, especially after it was confirmed to be authentic by both the Hawaiian Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino and the state's registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, say they checked health department records and have determined there's no doubt Obama was born in Hawaii.
He's black, he's American, and he's gonna be president. GET OVER IT EVERYONE!
he was actually born in the united States . Their is a birth certificate from Hawaii that proves he was born in USA in Hawaii . So all appeals will be not do anything , but blow a bunch of smoke .
IT`S A FORGERY FOR ONE. yOU CAN TELL THE COLOR OF IT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE OTHERS DONE ON THE SAME DAY EVEN ONES ON THE SAME 30 MINUTES OF TIME.IT`S BELIEVED THAT OBAM`AS PARENT HAD THE CERTIFICATE FAKED WHEN HE WAS 3 YEARS OLD.
He was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, last time I looked, that is a US state.
Is this even a legal case?
Someone made a fake profile of me and was ';dating'; a girl. The girl found out the person. The person faking me allegedly got money from this girl. However she did not make the check out to him, she made it out to a friend of his. Now she is talking about pressing charges on this person if he doesn't pay up. Does she even have a case? She has ims with person. Phone number and somewhat on location. Can she really do anything or is she bluffing this person out?Is this even a legal case?
Why do you even care?
If she knows the ';fake'; you is NOT really you then you should just walk away and let them sort it out.Is this even a legal case?
This could be considered wire fraud. Misrepresenting themselves to be someone else and getting money under false pretenses.
It's just very difficult to get a conviction.
Yes this is a legal case with legal bearing. For one thing, he impersonated someone else - YOU - to avoid detection. He knew he was going to defraud this girl of money, and he did so. Good luck to her and hope they throw the book at him !
What was the money supposed to be for?
The guy doing the faking could be part of a conspiracy to defraud (where the other conspirator is the ';friend of his';).
Yes, if they received money for something they said they were going to do and they don't do it and they don't refund it ... we call that stealing. In this case, they achieved the theft through fraud.
No idea how much money we're talking about or whether you know either of the two guys - but she was certainly legally wronged.
Why do you even care?
If she knows the ';fake'; you is NOT really you then you should just walk away and let them sort it out.Is this even a legal case?
This could be considered wire fraud. Misrepresenting themselves to be someone else and getting money under false pretenses.
It's just very difficult to get a conviction.
Yes this is a legal case with legal bearing. For one thing, he impersonated someone else - YOU - to avoid detection. He knew he was going to defraud this girl of money, and he did so. Good luck to her and hope they throw the book at him !
What was the money supposed to be for?
The guy doing the faking could be part of a conspiracy to defraud (where the other conspirator is the ';friend of his';).
Yes, if they received money for something they said they were going to do and they don't do it and they don't refund it ... we call that stealing. In this case, they achieved the theft through fraud.
No idea how much money we're talking about or whether you know either of the two guys - but she was certainly legally wronged.
Lawyers or legal experts, is this legal and do i have a case?
is this legal?
i live in ohio and i have been training for a job as a driving instructor. when i went and got my physical (state required physical, not company), the doctor put that it would not effect my ability to perform my daily duties. it has no adverse effect on me either. however, my employer is denying me employment as a result of taking the anti-depressant drug. keep in mind my doctor said it would not keep me from doing any of my duties. is this legal or do i have a law suit. thanks so much in advance. have a good day.Lawyers or legal experts, is this legal and do i have a case?
Disabling conditions, including those requiring the use of prescriptions meds, are protected under the Americans with Diabilities Act (ADA.) However, ADA only requires an employer to treat disabled individuals the same way that they treat non-disabled individuals. It does not require an employer to substantially change a policy in order to hire, promote, transfer, etc., an ADA-eligible individual.
Ask for a copy of their drug testing policy. If this employer has a policy that prohibits diving instructors from using any sort of drug (including Rx) that could impair mood, judgment, etc., then they are within their right to refuse to hire you. If they do NOT have a policy, and simply made a judgment call based on the test results, you may have grounds for a case.
Because the employer does not mandate drug testing itself, and simply reviewed the results of a state-mandated test, they have in effect used your personal health information to make an employment decision. If their requirement for this job does not include a bona-fide occupational qualification with respect to the use of controlled substances, they are asking for trouble.
Contact the dept of labor (www.dol.gov will have a link to an office close to you.) They will review your claim and if necessary, file a claim on your behalf against the employer for free. You may also want to check with an employment attorney who works on contingency (they get awarded a portion of the settlement they obtain for you.) Some offer free or low cost consultations.
Good luck.Lawyers or legal experts, is this legal and do i have a case?
I'm a lawyer, though not a litigator.
Generally, I don't think you have a great case here. I'm unaware of any ';protected class'; that exists for takers of anti-depressant medications, though you may wish to have a phone call with a plaintiff's attorney in Ohio who may be aware of any unique Ohio statutes or protections that may apply. Most contingency-fee plaintiff's lawyers will provide you with a free (confidential) consultation.
No case. There is no law requiring employers to hire people on antidepressants.
maybe if ur protected under the ADA
I doubt a lawyer would answer your question here. Attorneys' payment come from their time and knowledge. They rarely give it out for free. As for legal experts, if one of them answers, they are breaking the law. Only an attorney can give you advice. As a legal assistant, I recommend you contact the Bar Association in your area for a referral to an attorney who practices in Employment Law.
You don't have a case. All your employer-that-was has to say is ';We didn't hire him because we're concerned that he may forget to take his medication one day and what he might do if he did forget or missed his meds'; and the judge will buy it. You're talking about a job where you would be responsible for the safety of yourself and others, and an employer is clearly within their right to deny you employment for a condition that puts a client's safety at risk, even though your doctor said your condition doesn't affect your ability to perform your daily duties. They don't want to take the chance, and legally they don't have to.
I agree completely with Sarge927's response.
Good luck!
i live in ohio and i have been training for a job as a driving instructor. when i went and got my physical (state required physical, not company), the doctor put that it would not effect my ability to perform my daily duties. it has no adverse effect on me either. however, my employer is denying me employment as a result of taking the anti-depressant drug. keep in mind my doctor said it would not keep me from doing any of my duties. is this legal or do i have a law suit. thanks so much in advance. have a good day.Lawyers or legal experts, is this legal and do i have a case?
Disabling conditions, including those requiring the use of prescriptions meds, are protected under the Americans with Diabilities Act (ADA.) However, ADA only requires an employer to treat disabled individuals the same way that they treat non-disabled individuals. It does not require an employer to substantially change a policy in order to hire, promote, transfer, etc., an ADA-eligible individual.
Ask for a copy of their drug testing policy. If this employer has a policy that prohibits diving instructors from using any sort of drug (including Rx) that could impair mood, judgment, etc., then they are within their right to refuse to hire you. If they do NOT have a policy, and simply made a judgment call based on the test results, you may have grounds for a case.
Because the employer does not mandate drug testing itself, and simply reviewed the results of a state-mandated test, they have in effect used your personal health information to make an employment decision. If their requirement for this job does not include a bona-fide occupational qualification with respect to the use of controlled substances, they are asking for trouble.
Contact the dept of labor (www.dol.gov will have a link to an office close to you.) They will review your claim and if necessary, file a claim on your behalf against the employer for free. You may also want to check with an employment attorney who works on contingency (they get awarded a portion of the settlement they obtain for you.) Some offer free or low cost consultations.
Good luck.Lawyers or legal experts, is this legal and do i have a case?
I'm a lawyer, though not a litigator.
Generally, I don't think you have a great case here. I'm unaware of any ';protected class'; that exists for takers of anti-depressant medications, though you may wish to have a phone call with a plaintiff's attorney in Ohio who may be aware of any unique Ohio statutes or protections that may apply. Most contingency-fee plaintiff's lawyers will provide you with a free (confidential) consultation.
No case. There is no law requiring employers to hire people on antidepressants.
maybe if ur protected under the ADA
I doubt a lawyer would answer your question here. Attorneys' payment come from their time and knowledge. They rarely give it out for free. As for legal experts, if one of them answers, they are breaking the law. Only an attorney can give you advice. As a legal assistant, I recommend you contact the Bar Association in your area for a referral to an attorney who practices in Employment Law.
You don't have a case. All your employer-that-was has to say is ';We didn't hire him because we're concerned that he may forget to take his medication one day and what he might do if he did forget or missed his meds'; and the judge will buy it. You're talking about a job where you would be responsible for the safety of yourself and others, and an employer is clearly within their right to deny you employment for a condition that puts a client's safety at risk, even though your doctor said your condition doesn't affect your ability to perform your daily duties. They don't want to take the chance, and legally they don't have to.
I agree completely with Sarge927's response.
Good luck!
If girl is pregnant and boy doesnt wanna marren wats the legal case???pls help if i am the boy?
i don wanna marry the girl it was just a one nightt stand... now she is pregenant... it was a coensensual sex... but now the parrents are against... wat kind o legal case would get filed against me????If girl is pregnant and boy doesnt wanna marren wats the legal case???pls help if i am the boy?
if she is pregnant and keeps the child then just take care of your child. you cant get forced to marry her but make sure when the baby arrives you get a dna test just to prove paternity and if it is in fact your child just take care of your child that way if they try and take you to court they wont have a case against you because your only responsibility will be to that child, hope all goes wellIf girl is pregnant and boy doesnt wanna marren wats the legal case???pls help if i am the boy?
The girl can sue you for child support. That's about it. Unless she's a minor and you're not. Then they can get you for statutory rape. If you're from another country they have different customs and as a citizen of that country I would think you would know whats going to happen to you.
If her family is kind of old fashoned they might come to your house with a shot gun and make you marry her. No legal case. Just scaring the crap out of you to make an honest woman of their daughter.
see this blog.............
this is my husband picture.
he is a big crossdresser.
i know about his crossdressing after marriage of 2 years.
girfriend help for his crossdressing.
suggest what can i do.
my email address is
shruti28071981@yahoo.co.in
http://www.flickr.com/photos/priya2009/3456797374/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mensbra/3644461056/
You dont have to get married just because you got someone pregnant. But you need to take responsibility for your actions and that baby. If they do file a a law suit it will probably be for child support. If the baby is in fact yours you'll most likely be ordered to pay it.
Probably nothing, you are not legally obligated to marry a girl because you get her pregnant. You can get taken to court for child support if you are indeed the father, however.
If you didn't want a kid, then you should've kept your pants on. There's no way (legal or not) that you can be forced into marriage just because she's pregnant. But they can take you to court for child support/custody when the child is born.
You wouldn't get in any kind of legal case. You don't have to be with her. She may take you for child support but that's just about it. You can even get custody if you think youde be a better parent
Well....its not a law that you have to get married if the girl you slept with gets pregnant....
Is the girl under-age?
If not, then I'm pretty sure that they have no case..
plenty of people have children who aren't married. you are just obligated to pay child support if you are indeed the father. get a paternity test though.
Child support
You Jerk
Take care of your child!! Do you really think the woman you DO marry, her parents will want someone who has a child with someone else??
hmm...sex without condom you could have gotten aids
unless you are of age and the girl was not i'm not sure i understand the question. nothing can be done except sue for child support
The only thing they could sue you for is child-support. They can not make you marry her if you dont want too.
You don't have to marry the girl, but if u don't will you still take care of ure child??????
if she is pregnant and keeps the child then just take care of your child. you cant get forced to marry her but make sure when the baby arrives you get a dna test just to prove paternity and if it is in fact your child just take care of your child that way if they try and take you to court they wont have a case against you because your only responsibility will be to that child, hope all goes wellIf girl is pregnant and boy doesnt wanna marren wats the legal case???pls help if i am the boy?
The girl can sue you for child support. That's about it. Unless she's a minor and you're not. Then they can get you for statutory rape. If you're from another country they have different customs and as a citizen of that country I would think you would know whats going to happen to you.
If her family is kind of old fashoned they might come to your house with a shot gun and make you marry her. No legal case. Just scaring the crap out of you to make an honest woman of their daughter.
see this blog.............
this is my husband picture.
he is a big crossdresser.
i know about his crossdressing after marriage of 2 years.
girfriend help for his crossdressing.
suggest what can i do.
my email address is
shruti28071981@yahoo.co.in
http://www.flickr.com/photos/priya2009/3456797374/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mensbra/3644461056/
You dont have to get married just because you got someone pregnant. But you need to take responsibility for your actions and that baby. If they do file a a law suit it will probably be for child support. If the baby is in fact yours you'll most likely be ordered to pay it.
Probably nothing, you are not legally obligated to marry a girl because you get her pregnant. You can get taken to court for child support if you are indeed the father, however.
If you didn't want a kid, then you should've kept your pants on. There's no way (legal or not) that you can be forced into marriage just because she's pregnant. But they can take you to court for child support/custody when the child is born.
You wouldn't get in any kind of legal case. You don't have to be with her. She may take you for child support but that's just about it. You can even get custody if you think youde be a better parent
Well....its not a law that you have to get married if the girl you slept with gets pregnant....
Is the girl under-age?
If not, then I'm pretty sure that they have no case..
plenty of people have children who aren't married. you are just obligated to pay child support if you are indeed the father. get a paternity test though.
Child support
You Jerk
Take care of your child!! Do you really think the woman you DO marry, her parents will want someone who has a child with someone else??
hmm...sex without condom you could have gotten aids
unless you are of age and the girl was not i'm not sure i understand the question. nothing can be done except sue for child support
The only thing they could sue you for is child-support. They can not make you marry her if you dont want too.
You don't have to marry the girl, but if u don't will you still take care of ure child??????
When an elevator is illegally overloaded, Who is responsible in case of legal action?
Depending on the local code of your current area, most elevators have a sign, with a certain size of lettering stating the full capacity of the elevator in pounds/grams.
In California, they even go to as far as posting a permit located on the elevator telling you the maximum amount of people and weight allowed on the elevator.
On a commercial elevator(which is any elevator that is not classified as residental) the person who owns the elevator will be responsible for maintaining and securing their elevator so that riders have a safe ride and do not damage their equipment.
In NO way is the company who built or services the elevator responsible for customers overloading the elevator to a dangerous capacity. Overloading elevators is dangerous and can cause injury or death in some rare instances, which is the exact reason that local authorities make sure that the capacity of the elevator is clearly written on the operating panel in the elevator.
So most likely the building who owns and operates the elevator would be in trouble for not safeguarding their elevators from overloading. But then again, the building can blame the passengers for ignoring the capacity warnings inside the elevator.
Its a gray area.When an elevator is illegally overloaded, Who is responsible in case of legal action?
The last one on.
The first one off could be anyone.When an elevator is illegally overloaded, Who is responsible in case of legal action?
Probably depends on the company...If they say a weight limit or have some computer that shows when it's overloaded, then whoever last got on is responsible. If the company doesn't signify anything, the defendant is not liable for any charges, and no one would be responsible, and the company probably would be ordered to install a notification system of some kind.
Last one on or the first one off.
the management of that building
If there was a sign....the fools who got in above the max....and those that couldn't count and stayed
I guess it depends on the case- was it done on purpose, like as a prank?
in canada elevators have a certificate issued by the TSSA that certifies that the elevator has been tested, etc., and it states the parameters that it should operate under, including max. load, and there is a name on that document- usually the owner of the property. I would think that they would be the first ones to be sued (if someone got hurt for example), and then they would file their own suits against other parties if there were other parties to blame. Just a guess.
Have you ever tried to overload an elevator with people? It's pretty hard to do. They'd have to be REAL close friends.
When I was in college, a bunch of guys overloaded an elevator and started rocking the car on the way down. Something went wrong and they got stuck between floors for a couple of hours (I will take this as fate letting them off lightly). Anyway, the U added about $1K to each of their tuition/room accounts to pay for the damage, which was substantial. So in this case it was taken care of extrajudicially. If it went to a court, who knows.
In California, they even go to as far as posting a permit located on the elevator telling you the maximum amount of people and weight allowed on the elevator.
On a commercial elevator(which is any elevator that is not classified as residental) the person who owns the elevator will be responsible for maintaining and securing their elevator so that riders have a safe ride and do not damage their equipment.
In NO way is the company who built or services the elevator responsible for customers overloading the elevator to a dangerous capacity. Overloading elevators is dangerous and can cause injury or death in some rare instances, which is the exact reason that local authorities make sure that the capacity of the elevator is clearly written on the operating panel in the elevator.
So most likely the building who owns and operates the elevator would be in trouble for not safeguarding their elevators from overloading. But then again, the building can blame the passengers for ignoring the capacity warnings inside the elevator.
Its a gray area.When an elevator is illegally overloaded, Who is responsible in case of legal action?
The last one on.
The first one off could be anyone.When an elevator is illegally overloaded, Who is responsible in case of legal action?
Probably depends on the company...If they say a weight limit or have some computer that shows when it's overloaded, then whoever last got on is responsible. If the company doesn't signify anything, the defendant is not liable for any charges, and no one would be responsible, and the company probably would be ordered to install a notification system of some kind.
Last one on or the first one off.
the management of that building
If there was a sign....the fools who got in above the max....and those that couldn't count and stayed
I guess it depends on the case- was it done on purpose, like as a prank?
in canada elevators have a certificate issued by the TSSA that certifies that the elevator has been tested, etc., and it states the parameters that it should operate under, including max. load, and there is a name on that document- usually the owner of the property. I would think that they would be the first ones to be sued (if someone got hurt for example), and then they would file their own suits against other parties if there were other parties to blame. Just a guess.
Have you ever tried to overload an elevator with people? It's pretty hard to do. They'd have to be REAL close friends.
When I was in college, a bunch of guys overloaded an elevator and started rocking the car on the way down. Something went wrong and they got stuck between floors for a couple of hours (I will take this as fate letting them off lightly). Anyway, the U added about $1K to each of their tuition/room accounts to pay for the damage, which was substantial. So in this case it was taken care of extrajudicially. If it went to a court, who knows.
I had a tubal ligation 1 month ago and just found out i am 10 weeks pregnant, do I have a legal case.?
they should have picked up on it this is what even the nurses, Ultrasound tech, and others have told me. I am even more concerned now that we know it is not in the fallopian tubes , with all of the anesthesia and other things they were pumping in me may have hurt the baby. What should we do , do we have a legal caseI had a tubal ligation 1 month ago and just found out i am 10 weeks pregnant, do I have a legal case.?
You should talk to an attorney who specializes in medical malpractice. Some states allow wrongful pregnancy or wrongful birth claims, some do not. Your attorney will be able to give you a better idea of what remedies, if any, you might have.eye look
You should talk to an attorney who specializes in medical malpractice. Some states allow wrongful pregnancy or wrongful birth claims, some do not. Your attorney will be able to give you a better idea of what remedies, if any, you might have.
What legal actions can private banks in India take against credit card holders in case of over dues?
I was unable to pay my credit card due amount due to personal reasons. Now I'm being threatened by the bank that an non-bailable warrant has been issued against me. I received a call claiming that this was from a police station. Now, I'm worried. Can I be arrested for non-payment...??What legal actions can private banks in India take against credit card holders in case of over dues?
Hi,
I have found this site to be use full. Check it out鈥︹€?.
Hi,
I have found this site to be use full. Check it out鈥︹€?.
Do I have a case and is that what he is doing is legal and lawfully?
My ex boyfriend had been showing around to his colleagues which are my ex colleagues as well my personal text messages I have sent to him exposing our personal life and creating a bad image of me. Is that lawfully and can i sue him for that?Do I have a case and is that what he is doing is legal and lawfully?
It's an unethical but no illegal to show the text, however, he is harassing you by doing so so you could sue for that. Good luck.Do I have a case and is that what he is doing is legal and lawfully?
People need to learn that when you put something out on the internet it is a public domain which means anyone can take it and it becomes their property. There are those who send sexy pictures of themselves or even worse, images and videos depicting illicit behavior. Then they complain that they are getting a negative image. It's not private and when the relationship breaks up you already know he/she is going to use it to degrade you.
He is doing nothing illegal. You sent the text messages to him so he can show them to whoever he wants. That is why it is always important to think about what you are putting in writing.
It might not be a nice thing to do but its not illegal.
You sent those messages to him. They are now his property.
It's an unethical but no illegal to show the text, however, he is harassing you by doing so so you could sue for that. Good luck.Do I have a case and is that what he is doing is legal and lawfully?
People need to learn that when you put something out on the internet it is a public domain which means anyone can take it and it becomes their property. There are those who send sexy pictures of themselves or even worse, images and videos depicting illicit behavior. Then they complain that they are getting a negative image. It's not private and when the relationship breaks up you already know he/she is going to use it to degrade you.
He is doing nothing illegal. You sent the text messages to him so he can show them to whoever he wants. That is why it is always important to think about what you are putting in writing.
It might not be a nice thing to do but its not illegal.
You sent those messages to him. They are now his property.
Is it legal for a local news show to show a rape case of a girl that's 17 in Texas?
Can they be on the news if they're under 18?Is it legal for a local news show to show a rape case of a girl that's 17 in Texas?
As long as they don't show a picture or give a name of the victimIs it legal for a local news show to show a rape case of a girl that's 17 in Texas?
For the most part, the courts have not allowed for penalties against media outlets that publicized the names of rape victims. The issue is that crime reports are public records.
That said, most newspapers have an internal policy of not publishing victim names, but it would be next to impossible to have them punished for doing otherwise. This is a case in which the greater good is served by preserving First Amendment freedoms, though some harm may also result. But truthfully, hiding (sometimes called protecting) the names of any crime victim is an implicit statement that the victim has something to be ashamed about. Not true!
The story will, but the names will likely be omitted for minors.
it says RAPE CASE idiot.
and yes, it is.
As long as they don't show a picture or give a name of the victimIs it legal for a local news show to show a rape case of a girl that's 17 in Texas?
For the most part, the courts have not allowed for penalties against media outlets that publicized the names of rape victims. The issue is that crime reports are public records.
That said, most newspapers have an internal policy of not publishing victim names, but it would be next to impossible to have them punished for doing otherwise. This is a case in which the greater good is served by preserving First Amendment freedoms, though some harm may also result. But truthfully, hiding (sometimes called protecting) the names of any crime victim is an implicit statement that the victim has something to be ashamed about. Not true!
The story will, but the names will likely be omitted for minors.
it says RAPE CASE idiot.
and yes, it is.
What are the legal ramifications of a judge dismissing a case ';with prejudice';?
as opposed to a dismissal without prejudice?What are the legal ramifications of a judge dismissing a case ';with prejudice';?
info police info is incorrect. a dismissal of a case, with or without prejudice, ordinarily occurs before a trial on the evidence is begun. a dismissal with prejudice means the prosecutor cannot bring the same charges against that person again. this may occur if judge feels that prosecutor is unnecessarily delaying the case or some such. a dismissal with prejudice protects an accused from having to spend more money and time defending the charges. a dismissal of a case without prejudice means the same complaint or charges can be brought against the person again.What are the legal ramifications of a judge dismissing a case ';with prejudice';?
Dismissing with prejudice means that charges can be filed again in the future if the prosecution gets new evidence or amends the charges or something to that effect.
Dismissed without prejudice means the judge is basically ruling not guilty on the charges and double jeopardy would prevent the prosecution from charging the defendant again.
Actually -
with prejudice means it cannot be brought again
without prejudice means its dismissed ';for now'; but can be revisited with new evidence or by re-filing.
Info police has the explanations correct- you just have to switch the with or without part.
It means the case cannot be reopened or revisited. The judge's decision is final.
It means that the judge is not happy about the decision, but he or she must make it based on the evidence and the case cannot be reopened due to double jeopardy.
info police info is incorrect. a dismissal of a case, with or without prejudice, ordinarily occurs before a trial on the evidence is begun. a dismissal with prejudice means the prosecutor cannot bring the same charges against that person again. this may occur if judge feels that prosecutor is unnecessarily delaying the case or some such. a dismissal with prejudice protects an accused from having to spend more money and time defending the charges. a dismissal of a case without prejudice means the same complaint or charges can be brought against the person again.What are the legal ramifications of a judge dismissing a case ';with prejudice';?
Dismissing with prejudice means that charges can be filed again in the future if the prosecution gets new evidence or amends the charges or something to that effect.
Dismissed without prejudice means the judge is basically ruling not guilty on the charges and double jeopardy would prevent the prosecution from charging the defendant again.
Actually -
with prejudice means it cannot be brought again
without prejudice means its dismissed ';for now'; but can be revisited with new evidence or by re-filing.
Info police has the explanations correct- you just have to switch the with or without part.
It means the case cannot be reopened or revisited. The judge's decision is final.
It means that the judge is not happy about the decision, but he or she must make it based on the evidence and the case cannot be reopened due to double jeopardy.
How many of you think the Anna Nicole Smith case will help set legal precedence in regards deceased bodies?
No. I don't think so . What happens for the rich and famous never touches mere mortals..How many of you think the Anna Nicole Smith case will help set legal precedence in regards deceased bodies?
I hope it sets a precedence on who can become a judge. What a joke.How many of you think the Anna Nicole Smith case will help set legal precedence in regards deceased bodies?
Let's hope not for everyone's sake. This has been nothing but a circus and a very sad one at that.
no it will not. This case was not really about the body. It is about the custody of the child that Stern took to the Bahamas. Nobody cared about the body. Hell they did not care about her when she was alive. This is all about money and custody of the child this was just the first battle. It had nothing to do with the body.
I hope it sets a precedence on who can become a judge. What a joke.How many of you think the Anna Nicole Smith case will help set legal precedence in regards deceased bodies?
Let's hope not for everyone's sake. This has been nothing but a circus and a very sad one at that.
no it will not. This case was not really about the body. It is about the custody of the child that Stern took to the Bahamas. Nobody cared about the body. Hell they did not care about her when she was alive. This is all about money and custody of the child this was just the first battle. It had nothing to do with the body.
How do i put a legal case in federal court?
there are generally two basis for federal jurisdiction: diversity of citizenship between the parties and federal question.eye look
Legal representation for out-of-state cases?
A friend of mine owes the court money in another state. It is for administrative fees involving a case that was heard, not a fine that was levied.
We've been told he must appear in person at the other court, and pay the fine. The problem is that his license is suspended (from the other state) and he has no photo ID. Without it, he cannot board a train, plane or bus to get back to that state.
Trying to find a lawyer in FL that could represent him in this matter -- he wants to pay the court, he has themoney -- he just has no means of getting there in person.Legal representation for out-of-state cases?
You could get a lawfirm that has more than one office. YOu could get a lwayer in the state he lives. That lawyer could get something to be able to temporarily practice law in that state. I would guess it would be expensive since the lawyer has to fly over there. You could go to the internet and find a lawyer in FLorida. Its a simple matter. I don't see much problem in it.
We've been told he must appear in person at the other court, and pay the fine. The problem is that his license is suspended (from the other state) and he has no photo ID. Without it, he cannot board a train, plane or bus to get back to that state.
Trying to find a lawyer in FL that could represent him in this matter -- he wants to pay the court, he has themoney -- he just has no means of getting there in person.Legal representation for out-of-state cases?
You could get a lawfirm that has more than one office. YOu could get a lwayer in the state he lives. That lawyer could get something to be able to temporarily practice law in that state. I would guess it would be expensive since the lawyer has to fly over there. You could go to the internet and find a lawyer in FLorida. Its a simple matter. I don't see much problem in it.
Have a crush on my lawyer. Now my legal case is over. How do I still keep in contact with him ?
I have met this 45-year-old lawyer for 4 months. He has been helping me to get my student visa back. First I'm not sexually attracted to him. Then a '; crush '; began to build up . I found that he's already very hot in his suits. Then I won the tribunal. He became my hero. This has deepen my love to him. He has been always kind to me. And he always has a warm smile on his face. I always want to kiss him and hug him.
I CAN'T stop thinking of him. I often dream of my lawyer having itimacy with me . It felt so good. i hope my dream willl come true 1 day.
I know love is not always available so i need to grab any chance if possible. Now the legal case is over. Can I ask him to go swimming together / having coffee together ?Have a crush on my lawyer. Now my legal case is over. How do I still keep in contact with him ?
yes you should but i think you should ask him out for coffee not swimming.coffe seems like a typical 1st date. So go head gurl and do wat u think is rightHave a crush on my lawyer. Now my legal case is over. How do I still keep in contact with him ?
how old r u? he's 45 and ur getting ur student visa????? most likely he's married. sorry to tell ya, but he was ur laywer he's paid to be nice and smile @ u. he gets paid big bucks for each person that walks through his door. he's a very busy man. i honestly would drop ur ';crush'; and leave it at that.
ask him out for lunch after he finishes work =) then maybe invite him to play squash or whatever sports you play
He helped you at a time when you needed help. Women often develop feeling for their lawyer that helped them. I don't know if he returns your feelings or not. Find out.
More than likely he is married. If he was your lawyer more than likely you had not think of him sexually....you may need him again down the line on another case. You can keep your fantasies....but I wouldn't go any further. There are more fish out in the sea....better look elsewhere.
He is look like your father you can show the love as a Daughter he also doing the same other wise he will straightaway call for you to bed you can have coffee together.
Two think certain in life is taxes and screw by lawyer ! if you just would like to get laid go head he will probably will if his wife or girlfriend out of town or something but if he have good professional ethic he will run as fast he could away from you .
Just go ahead and ask him to dinner. See what happens. Good luck!
if he is really interested in you,he will make the first move.
I CAN'T stop thinking of him. I often dream of my lawyer having itimacy with me . It felt so good. i hope my dream willl come true 1 day.
I know love is not always available so i need to grab any chance if possible. Now the legal case is over. Can I ask him to go swimming together / having coffee together ?Have a crush on my lawyer. Now my legal case is over. How do I still keep in contact with him ?
yes you should but i think you should ask him out for coffee not swimming.coffe seems like a typical 1st date. So go head gurl and do wat u think is rightHave a crush on my lawyer. Now my legal case is over. How do I still keep in contact with him ?
how old r u? he's 45 and ur getting ur student visa????? most likely he's married. sorry to tell ya, but he was ur laywer he's paid to be nice and smile @ u. he gets paid big bucks for each person that walks through his door. he's a very busy man. i honestly would drop ur ';crush'; and leave it at that.
ask him out for lunch after he finishes work =) then maybe invite him to play squash or whatever sports you play
He helped you at a time when you needed help. Women often develop feeling for their lawyer that helped them. I don't know if he returns your feelings or not. Find out.
More than likely he is married. If he was your lawyer more than likely you had not think of him sexually....you may need him again down the line on another case. You can keep your fantasies....but I wouldn't go any further. There are more fish out in the sea....better look elsewhere.
He is look like your father you can show the love as a Daughter he also doing the same other wise he will straightaway call for you to bed you can have coffee together.
Two think certain in life is taxes and screw by lawyer ! if you just would like to get laid go head he will probably will if his wife or girlfriend out of town or something but if he have good professional ethic he will run as fast he could away from you .
Just go ahead and ask him to dinner. See what happens. Good luck!
if he is really interested in you,he will make the first move.
How do move legal case in federal court?
Appeal the judgement of the federal court to the higher court if you want to move the case.How do move legal case in federal court?
Say what? You need to retype this question with proper grammar.How do move legal case in federal court?
Are you being charged by the word?
Your question is too poorly written to answer.
What is the federal issue that applies to your case?
If you're just a common criminal, that's a state matter.
Say what? You need to retype this question with proper grammar.How do move legal case in federal court?
Are you being charged by the word?
Your question is too poorly written to answer.
What is the federal issue that applies to your case?
If you're just a common criminal, that's a state matter.
What are the Early case assessment and fixed cost eDiscovery in legal risk management?
I'm not quite sure what you mean, but early case assessment means that a lawyer and/or investigator is going to check out your case and see if it is financially worthwhile. eDiscovery is when you request docs from the other side (or vice versa) and they are scanned in (or in email, .doc, etc... form) and transferred to you over the internet or on disc rather than paper forms. It's much cheaper, but I have not heard of fixed cost (I work ediscovery litigation support). Usually it is based upon the number of pages or documents. What are the Early case assessment and fixed cost eDiscovery in legal risk management?
Early case assessment and fixed cost eDiscovery are two areas in legal risk management that require specific attention. Fixed cost eDiscovery is designed to address the financial risk associated with large legal cases.
Early case assessment is done by an organization to manage the organizations legal risk exposure. Early case assessment (ECA) can be considered the artillery in the armory that legal counsel takes to their meet-confer meetings. ECA includes information about custodians, context and concepts and will help legal counsel manage the outcome of the meet-and-confer meetings. However, it is not supposed to be this way.
Early case assessment and fixed cost eDiscovery are two areas in legal risk management that require specific attention. Fixed cost eDiscovery is designed to address the financial risk associated with large legal cases.
Early case assessment is done by an organization to manage the organizations legal risk exposure. Early case assessment (ECA) can be considered the artillery in the armory that legal counsel takes to their meet-confer meetings. ECA includes information about custodians, context and concepts and will help legal counsel manage the outcome of the meet-and-confer meetings. However, it is not supposed to be this way.
In cases of rape, should abortions be legal? (see details)?
Some people believe that abortion should only be legal in cases of rape. Isn't that like someone saying 'Since I was raped, that gives me permission to murder someone.'?In cases of rape, should abortions be legal? (see details)?
Instead you would murder the woman who was raped.
You vile, evil creature.
You would force a woman who was raped to carry the child of her rapist.
You vile, evil, filthy piece of trash.
Rape is the worst thing that can happen to a woman.
Rape is worse than murder, it destroys a woman for the rest of her life.
A woman's life ends the day that she is raped.
For a woman, being forced to carry the child of her rapist is murder.
You stupid clown. You cannot be serious.In cases of rape, should abortions be legal? (see details)?
It's not the child that needs killing!
there needs to be some consideration for the woman in cases like this. the mental trauma would be severe to say the least. i support abortion for rape and danger to the woman's health. i don't in all other cases.
';Certainly, because it's an unwanted pregnancy which was caused by a criminal act.';
YES!! If the victim requests it.
no..abortion is murder to be and even in cases of rape i think it shouldn't be allowed
YES!!! She didn't ask for it! It's her choice. It's her body and she should be able to do whatever she wants with it. Who is anyone to tell a woman what to do with HER body. I dare someone to tell me if I got raped that I had to keep that thing. I'd make my way to the nearest set of steps and roll on down them. If you got raped I bet you'd think twice about looking that kid in the face.
Yes because abortion isn't murder.
This is a fundamental question on which people will never agree. If you truly believe that life begins at conception, then you will probably never accept rape as a justification for abortion. If you believe, as I do, that abortion is an option of last resort and that a zygote is not yet ';human'; in every sense of the word, then you would accept abortion in the case of rape, incest, and risk to the mother's health.
Afterall, fetuses miscarry thousands of times a day. We don't have a funeral when a woman miscarries at three months... just how different is intentionally terminating an unwanted pregnancy?
Also, if your reason for being ';Pro-Life'; (whatever that means), is based on religious grounds, then there is no sense in trying to discuss the matter with you...your mind is made up.
No.
Why should you follow up a rape with a murder?
It would be much better if we expanded our 2nd amendment rights and women just start shooting their attackers. At least then the criminal pays for the crime and not the innocent.
Yes it should be legal no matter what.
What I do with my body is none of your damn business.eye look
Instead you would murder the woman who was raped.
You vile, evil creature.
You would force a woman who was raped to carry the child of her rapist.
You vile, evil, filthy piece of trash.
Rape is the worst thing that can happen to a woman.
Rape is worse than murder, it destroys a woman for the rest of her life.
A woman's life ends the day that she is raped.
For a woman, being forced to carry the child of her rapist is murder.
You stupid clown. You cannot be serious.In cases of rape, should abortions be legal? (see details)?
It's not the child that needs killing!
there needs to be some consideration for the woman in cases like this. the mental trauma would be severe to say the least. i support abortion for rape and danger to the woman's health. i don't in all other cases.
';Certainly, because it's an unwanted pregnancy which was caused by a criminal act.';
YES!! If the victim requests it.
no..abortion is murder to be and even in cases of rape i think it shouldn't be allowed
YES!!! She didn't ask for it! It's her choice. It's her body and she should be able to do whatever she wants with it. Who is anyone to tell a woman what to do with HER body. I dare someone to tell me if I got raped that I had to keep that thing. I'd make my way to the nearest set of steps and roll on down them. If you got raped I bet you'd think twice about looking that kid in the face.
Yes because abortion isn't murder.
This is a fundamental question on which people will never agree. If you truly believe that life begins at conception, then you will probably never accept rape as a justification for abortion. If you believe, as I do, that abortion is an option of last resort and that a zygote is not yet ';human'; in every sense of the word, then you would accept abortion in the case of rape, incest, and risk to the mother's health.
Afterall, fetuses miscarry thousands of times a day. We don't have a funeral when a woman miscarries at three months... just how different is intentionally terminating an unwanted pregnancy?
Also, if your reason for being ';Pro-Life'; (whatever that means), is based on religious grounds, then there is no sense in trying to discuss the matter with you...your mind is made up.
No.
Why should you follow up a rape with a murder?
It would be much better if we expanded our 2nd amendment rights and women just start shooting their attackers. At least then the criminal pays for the crime and not the innocent.
Yes it should be legal no matter what.
What I do with my body is none of your damn business.
Can anyone direct me to a detailed explanation of the complete legal process in a criminal case?
First there is an Arainment. All you do is go to court and tell then weather you plan to hire an attorney or if you need a court appointed attorney.
Word to the wise: Court Appointed attorneys suck. Find a good attorney that will not settle for a plea bargin. Go for the win in General District Court. If you loose there appeal it and get a jury trial in Circuit Court.
Then after the arainment they give you a court date. Find a lawywer before your court date and tell them the entire story. Dont leave out any details. There might be a loop hole. You must pay the lawyer in full before he will appear in court for you. If it is a lot of money set up a payment plan with them so that they can notify the court that they are representing you. The Lawyer will continue out the case until they are fully paid.
Then you go to trial and you will get up on the stand and tell your side of the story. And the other side gets to tell their side of the story. Make sure you bring pictures, or anything else that will support your defense.
DO NOT COP A PLEA BARGIN. GO FOR THE WIN.
Word to the wise: Court Appointed attorneys suck. Find a good attorney that will not settle for a plea bargin. Go for the win in General District Court. If you loose there appeal it and get a jury trial in Circuit Court.
Then after the arainment they give you a court date. Find a lawywer before your court date and tell them the entire story. Dont leave out any details. There might be a loop hole. You must pay the lawyer in full before he will appear in court for you. If it is a lot of money set up a payment plan with them so that they can notify the court that they are representing you. The Lawyer will continue out the case until they are fully paid.
Then you go to trial and you will get up on the stand and tell your side of the story. And the other side gets to tell their side of the story. Make sure you bring pictures, or anything else that will support your defense.
DO NOT COP A PLEA BARGIN. GO FOR THE WIN.
Legal question. In a bankruptcy case, can the craditor's daughter be the Trustee or the judge ?
Does she violet any law ?Legal question. In a bankruptcy case, can the craditor's daughter be the Trustee or the judge ?
Most people here will not give the best information, I would visit a website like http://diylegalinfo.com/ for more acurate informationLegal question. In a bankruptcy case, can the craditor's daughter be the Trustee or the judge ?
No. It's a conflict of interest.
Most people here will not give the best information, I would visit a website like http://diylegalinfo.com/ for more acurate informationLegal question. In a bankruptcy case, can the craditor's daughter be the Trustee or the judge ?
No. It's a conflict of interest.
Any good lawyers for legal case in singapore? need to find out more about bigamy?
my wife lied to me about her martial status before I married her. I found evidence petaining to that but I can't hold of her previous marriage cert as it was in indonesia, very difficult to find out where she registered her marriage there but I manage to get her first husbands contact and her admits that he married her but they are not divorced. hope the notes that I found will help me with as she wrote she was married but I did not give her time to settle her divorce. How was I to know that she was married in the first place ? she is giving me lots of problems at the moment, I need advice on how to deal with this situation I am in. she manage to get a job and now she is holding a work permit. will the letter she wrote and sign help me in any way?Any good lawyers for legal case in singapore? need to find out more about bigamy?
Where did you and your ';wife'; got married? In Singapore? Are you a Singapore citizen / PR? Do email me if you need. I'm not a lawyer but I can offer you some direction and a divorce lawyer if you need.
Where did you and your ';wife'; got married? In Singapore? Are you a Singapore citizen / PR? Do email me if you need. I'm not a lawyer but I can offer you some direction and a divorce lawyer if you need.
I had a prov offer for job. They messed up the recruiting now offered someone else. Do I have legal case?
Basically the guy who took the exam the same time as me got told he fail the examination. I then got a provisional offer and moved closer to the job location....then they told me they had messed up the marking of the exam and the other chap has now got the job!!!I had a prov offer for job. They messed up the recruiting now offered someone else. Do I have legal case?
Try looking up the meaning of the word 'Provisional' ..I had a prov offer for job. They messed up the recruiting now offered someone else. Do I have legal case?
Depends on what they said to you ... a verbal offer is still a legally-binding offer once you have accepted it.
Offers are usually only provisional on things like satisfactory references, criminal records checks or proof of qualifications (yours, not someone else's!)
Did they tell you they were waiting for someone else's results? Did they agree a start date with you? Did they seek out your references? Did they pay for you to relocate? If these things have happened it would suggest they were intending to employ you ...
Sounds like you're not going to get anywhere with this actual job, and I think you have to ask whether you'd want to work for such an unprofessional organisation anyway. If you want to pursue it you could complain to them and seek your notice pay. If that gets you nowhere you could complain to an employment tribunal for breach of contract. If you think you've been discriminated against (e.g. race, age, religion, gender, disability, sexual orientation) then you could complain on that basis too.
But I think you need to ask yourself if it's worth all of that hassle, money, energy and time.
I would talk to an attorney right away. It sounds like there are elements of negligence.
1. They owed a duty.
2. The duty was breached.
3. There were damages.
4. The damages resulted from the breach.
If they make a error with the marking which caused you some expense you can claim what it has cost you because of their negligence. You can't make them give you the job.
That really sucks, but no I wouldnt say you have a legal case, it was only a provisional offer and you hadnt signed a contract.
I would say not. You should always wait for a proper / formal offer.
Sorry if this is not what you want to hear but you will be flogging a dead horse pursuing something like this.
Try looking up the meaning of the word 'Provisional' ..I had a prov offer for job. They messed up the recruiting now offered someone else. Do I have legal case?
Depends on what they said to you ... a verbal offer is still a legally-binding offer once you have accepted it.
Offers are usually only provisional on things like satisfactory references, criminal records checks or proof of qualifications (yours, not someone else's!)
Did they tell you they were waiting for someone else's results? Did they agree a start date with you? Did they seek out your references? Did they pay for you to relocate? If these things have happened it would suggest they were intending to employ you ...
Sounds like you're not going to get anywhere with this actual job, and I think you have to ask whether you'd want to work for such an unprofessional organisation anyway. If you want to pursue it you could complain to them and seek your notice pay. If that gets you nowhere you could complain to an employment tribunal for breach of contract. If you think you've been discriminated against (e.g. race, age, religion, gender, disability, sexual orientation) then you could complain on that basis too.
But I think you need to ask yourself if it's worth all of that hassle, money, energy and time.
I would talk to an attorney right away. It sounds like there are elements of negligence.
1. They owed a duty.
2. The duty was breached.
3. There were damages.
4. The damages resulted from the breach.
If they make a error with the marking which caused you some expense you can claim what it has cost you because of their negligence. You can't make them give you the job.
That really sucks, but no I wouldnt say you have a legal case, it was only a provisional offer and you hadnt signed a contract.
I would say not. You should always wait for a proper / formal offer.
Sorry if this is not what you want to hear but you will be flogging a dead horse pursuing something like this.
Case study scenario what do you think are the ethical and legal issues when working with a young girl?
A nine year old girl is referred is referred to you (counsellor) by her GP as she is profoundly depressed. The referral letter arrives in the mail and gives information about the mother.
- A long history of contact with mental health services.
-History of child sexual assault by a family member.
Client reports that this still happens occassionally
Long history of self harm
Seems to be distant absentminded during sessions
It has been noted that the mother is cold, angry and withdrawn
Tafe assignment please replyCase study scenario what do you think are the ethical and legal issues when working with a young girl?
I don't know, be her friend.
- A long history of contact with mental health services.
-History of child sexual assault by a family member.
Client reports that this still happens occassionally
Long history of self harm
Seems to be distant absentminded during sessions
It has been noted that the mother is cold, angry and withdrawn
Tafe assignment please replyCase study scenario what do you think are the ethical and legal issues when working with a young girl?
I don't know, be her friend.
Where can I get good free legal advice so that I can find out if I have a case worth drawing up a lawsuit?
I am looking to sue for around $3,500 - I just need someone to look at the literature to find out if there is a solid case. I would like to find someone around the area of Dayton, Ohio... or if someone could point me in the direction of HOW to find someone around Dayton so that I may contact them for free legal advice. This is not a worker's comp. suit, which I find that most free legal advice is for. There are a lot of dimensions to this possible case, so I would really like to get someone that knows what they are doing. Any help?Where can I get good free legal advice so that I can find out if I have a case worth drawing up a lawsuit?
You did not mention the nature of the suit, only the amount of damages. Without knowing the nature of the suit, its really difficult to tell you if you will find someone willing to give you free legal advice.
If, for instance, its a collections matter, you may be able to find an attorney who will do it for you on a contingency basis, and then charge a percentage of the amount collected. This presumes, of course, that he or she believes that you have a valid claim.
Other claims which require their professional expertise may or may not be done on a contingency basis. I strongly advise you not to try and sue on your own. Its been my experience that people who try and sue on their own, in anywhere but a small claims court, generally end up paying an attorney more money to undo the mess they created than they would have paid an attorney to do the matter correctly in the first place.
Contact your local or state bar association for a referral to an attorney licensed in Ohio.Where can I get good free legal advice so that I can find out if I have a case worth drawing up a lawsuit?
The previous answerers are correct in that without providing any facts of your particular case, there really isn't any way of even telling you where to go for advice, let actually giving you any here. Attorneys tend to specialize in certain practice areas, so without even knowing what we're looking at, it's hard to send you in any one direction.
But for starters, the amount in controversy is pretty small. $3,500 in attorneys fees won't get you very far, as they can charge upwards of $100 an hour. Many attorneys provide a free consultation to determine whether or not they think you've got a case, but after that the hourly rate kicks in. Even if you should win, you're looking at spending up to half of your award on a lawyer, and if you lose, you're hundreds to thousands of dollars in the hole.
As $3000 is the dollar limit for small claims court, you're probably better off going there, as you don't need an attorney in that venue. Small claims courts have a dramatically simplified procedure when compared to regular civil courts. They don't have juries, discovery phases, and don't deal in libel or slander. They also don't offer anything but monetary awards. But the upshot is that you can represent yourself and there isn't any real loss should you lose, just court costs, which don't amount to much. You can't make a claim for the whole $3,500, but you're unlikely to recoup all of that in a full civil court anyways.
The Ohio Bar Association has information regarding lawyer referral services for your area that you can check out (source listed below). Regardless, there shouldn't normally be a fee charged to you for an initial consultation. However, if you're going to ask an attorney to do research, they're going to want to get paid for it.
A dispute over $3500 doesn't sound that complicated. You could do the research yourself.
most likely, you have no case, or you would already have an attorney.
Make sure before you pursue a lawsuit that it is not frivolous. Frivolous lawsuits are the cause of high insurance prices, high medical prices, and in effect are what prevents so many US citizens from being able to afford medical coverage.
Why should a lawyer be expected to solve your legal problems for free?
Do you regularly call up plumbers and say ';I just need someone to fix my sink'; and expect it to be free? How about your mechanic? Do you expect him to solve your auto problems for free too?
No one is going to take time to sit down with you and listen to your whole story and go over all your paperwork with you and use their very expensive education and years of experience and expertise in order to advise you and guide you for free out of the goodness of their heart. Their bills are not going to be paid by sitting around with you and working for free.
Personal injury firms and WC firms generate their income on a contingency basis so their time is not money when it comes to handing out free consultations. For everyone else, time is money.
Suck it up and pay someone for some competent advice in the matter you need help with.
Start calling attorneys. A lot of them will do a free consultation on the first visit. The attorney may even take the case for you on a contingency basis.
Take Careeye look
You did not mention the nature of the suit, only the amount of damages. Without knowing the nature of the suit, its really difficult to tell you if you will find someone willing to give you free legal advice.
If, for instance, its a collections matter, you may be able to find an attorney who will do it for you on a contingency basis, and then charge a percentage of the amount collected. This presumes, of course, that he or she believes that you have a valid claim.
Other claims which require their professional expertise may or may not be done on a contingency basis. I strongly advise you not to try and sue on your own. Its been my experience that people who try and sue on their own, in anywhere but a small claims court, generally end up paying an attorney more money to undo the mess they created than they would have paid an attorney to do the matter correctly in the first place.
Contact your local or state bar association for a referral to an attorney licensed in Ohio.Where can I get good free legal advice so that I can find out if I have a case worth drawing up a lawsuit?
The previous answerers are correct in that without providing any facts of your particular case, there really isn't any way of even telling you where to go for advice, let actually giving you any here. Attorneys tend to specialize in certain practice areas, so without even knowing what we're looking at, it's hard to send you in any one direction.
But for starters, the amount in controversy is pretty small. $3,500 in attorneys fees won't get you very far, as they can charge upwards of $100 an hour. Many attorneys provide a free consultation to determine whether or not they think you've got a case, but after that the hourly rate kicks in. Even if you should win, you're looking at spending up to half of your award on a lawyer, and if you lose, you're hundreds to thousands of dollars in the hole.
As $3000 is the dollar limit for small claims court, you're probably better off going there, as you don't need an attorney in that venue. Small claims courts have a dramatically simplified procedure when compared to regular civil courts. They don't have juries, discovery phases, and don't deal in libel or slander. They also don't offer anything but monetary awards. But the upshot is that you can represent yourself and there isn't any real loss should you lose, just court costs, which don't amount to much. You can't make a claim for the whole $3,500, but you're unlikely to recoup all of that in a full civil court anyways.
The Ohio Bar Association has information regarding lawyer referral services for your area that you can check out (source listed below). Regardless, there shouldn't normally be a fee charged to you for an initial consultation. However, if you're going to ask an attorney to do research, they're going to want to get paid for it.
A dispute over $3500 doesn't sound that complicated. You could do the research yourself.
most likely, you have no case, or you would already have an attorney.
Make sure before you pursue a lawsuit that it is not frivolous. Frivolous lawsuits are the cause of high insurance prices, high medical prices, and in effect are what prevents so many US citizens from being able to afford medical coverage.
Why should a lawyer be expected to solve your legal problems for free?
Do you regularly call up plumbers and say ';I just need someone to fix my sink'; and expect it to be free? How about your mechanic? Do you expect him to solve your auto problems for free too?
No one is going to take time to sit down with you and listen to your whole story and go over all your paperwork with you and use their very expensive education and years of experience and expertise in order to advise you and guide you for free out of the goodness of their heart. Their bills are not going to be paid by sitting around with you and working for free.
Personal injury firms and WC firms generate their income on a contingency basis so their time is not money when it comes to handing out free consultations. For everyone else, time is money.
Suck it up and pay someone for some competent advice in the matter you need help with.
Start calling attorneys. A lot of them will do a free consultation on the first visit. The attorney may even take the case for you on a contingency basis.
Take Care
Is it legal in NJ for an officer or detective to work on a case where their family member was a victim?
If a person was assulted could their father work on their case as an investigator. The person's father is a officer or a detective and he has been working on this assult case. I want to know is this legal.Is it legal in NJ for an officer or detective to work on a case where their family member was a victim?
Yes and eventually it will catch up with the officer. Some detail will come to the attention of the department or the states attorney's office will do a background search and the officer's name will pop up. Then the office of professional standards will be notified and a probably good officer will jeopardize his career with revenge. The officer can do some investigating if it is kept above board and known but still the other party will question his impartiality in court. Better to give any and all information over to someone else for investigating.Is it legal in NJ for an officer or detective to work on a case where their family member was a victim?
I'm sure it's not illegal. The department may not recommend it, but i doubt there are any laws.
I seriously doubt if it is illegal anywhere. It is probably against police policy and procedure, but that is not the same as being illegal.
They can not anywhere, it is like a conflict of interest.
Yes and eventually it will catch up with the officer. Some detail will come to the attention of the department or the states attorney's office will do a background search and the officer's name will pop up. Then the office of professional standards will be notified and a probably good officer will jeopardize his career with revenge. The officer can do some investigating if it is kept above board and known but still the other party will question his impartiality in court. Better to give any and all information over to someone else for investigating.Is it legal in NJ for an officer or detective to work on a case where their family member was a victim?
I'm sure it's not illegal. The department may not recommend it, but i doubt there are any laws.
I seriously doubt if it is illegal anywhere. It is probably against police policy and procedure, but that is not the same as being illegal.
They can not anywhere, it is like a conflict of interest.
Is It Legal For A Prosecutor or a Defense Attorney to Divulge Points of a Case to the Public?
Is it Legal for Anyone to give away details or anything about a case to the general public, before a case. For example, a man is accused of Larceny by Employee, is it okay for the prosecution or the Defense Attorneys to give out specific information such as evidence or things said to the public?Is It Legal For A Prosecutor or a Defense Attorney to Divulge Points of a Case to the Public?
Criminal trials and their proceedings are a matter of public record. As such, there is no law prohibiting the prosecutor from revealing details about a case or information that he believes to be true prior to holding the actual trial. An exception would be either a case involving a minor, or a case wherein the judge has issued a gag order.Is It Legal For A Prosecutor or a Defense Attorney to Divulge Points of a Case to the Public?
Probably not a question of legality, more of a question of legal ethics, or procedure before trial.
It's done a lot, and may be in bad form, or may be a good thing for a case with high public interest, but that's how things are done.
Is it legal for the news media to publish or report stories that are false? That too is done a lot, and while it may be a bad idea, the gullible public tends to believe poorly developed reports if they coincide with their preconceived ideas of what is right. Most of the anti-Bush stories fall into this catetory, as do the Anti-Palin stories. They meet the needs of some, whether or not they are true.
Unless the judge has issued a gag order, either side can talk to anyone who will listen.
Criminal trials and their proceedings are a matter of public record. As such, there is no law prohibiting the prosecutor from revealing details about a case or information that he believes to be true prior to holding the actual trial. An exception would be either a case involving a minor, or a case wherein the judge has issued a gag order.Is It Legal For A Prosecutor or a Defense Attorney to Divulge Points of a Case to the Public?
Probably not a question of legality, more of a question of legal ethics, or procedure before trial.
It's done a lot, and may be in bad form, or may be a good thing for a case with high public interest, but that's how things are done.
Is it legal for the news media to publish or report stories that are false? That too is done a lot, and while it may be a bad idea, the gullible public tends to believe poorly developed reports if they coincide with their preconceived ideas of what is right. Most of the anti-Bush stories fall into this catetory, as do the Anti-Palin stories. They meet the needs of some, whether or not they are true.
Unless the judge has issued a gag order, either side can talk to anyone who will listen.
Is it legal to produce images (dolls in this case) of famous people without paying any licensing fees?
ie - I create a doll in your image, are you able to sue me?Is it legal to produce images (dolls in this case) of famous people without paying any licensing fees?
No, it's not legal and absolutey I could and would sue you! There have been many instances where doll makers had to stop production because they didn't have the authority to use a star's name %26amp; likeness. There are always people who want to cash in on another person's fame, luckily there are laws to protect against them.Is it legal to produce images (dolls in this case) of famous people without paying any licensing fees?
Oh yeah...you can produce anythig and give it away, but if you start charging for it, they have a copywright on their own images and/or likeness.
No, it's not legal and absolutey I could and would sue you! There have been many instances where doll makers had to stop production because they didn't have the authority to use a star's name %26amp; likeness. There are always people who want to cash in on another person's fame, luckily there are laws to protect against them.Is it legal to produce images (dolls in this case) of famous people without paying any licensing fees?
Oh yeah...you can produce anythig and give it away, but if you start charging for it, they have a copywright on their own images and/or likeness.
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Do I need legal aid to get custody in this case?
My daughter has two daughters from a relationship where she lived with, but never married the father and no longer resides with him.Do I need legal aid to get custody in this case?
You do not get any custody. Your daughter has the children and you don't have any rights to them. You would have to have your own children to have any custody rights.Do I need legal aid to get custody in this case?
My husband and I have custody of two of our youngest daughter's children. We have had them since they were born (10 months apart).
She came back a couple of years later and wanted the two kids back after she had moved in with a convicted sex offender (not the children's father).
You did not mention what state you live in, but we live in Florida and the grand-children's father lives in Georgia. We had to hire and attorney and find him, then we had to serve papers on him in order to get custody. Thank goodness he took our side in the whole mess. But here in Florida, if you know who the father is, then you have to have him served with papers that you are seeking custody of the two children. It doesn't matter if they were married or not, you have to find the father and have him served too.
I think it would be safe for the children to get custody I don't know what the situation is. But it should be written by the judge who the children should reside with and when visitation days and hours between a mediator or whatever their called. It's just safe for the children. I remember my son was taken my his father and I got so scared because the judge ordered him to stay with my son at his mothers house. And he took off to his house far and I didn't have a car to go and get him. When I called the police they couldn't do nothing because I didn't have proof of the court order.
guessing you have reason to believe your daughter is not a good mother? I suppose you could get a lawyer..
You do not get any custody. Your daughter has the children and you don't have any rights to them. You would have to have your own children to have any custody rights.Do I need legal aid to get custody in this case?
My husband and I have custody of two of our youngest daughter's children. We have had them since they were born (10 months apart).
She came back a couple of years later and wanted the two kids back after she had moved in with a convicted sex offender (not the children's father).
You did not mention what state you live in, but we live in Florida and the grand-children's father lives in Georgia. We had to hire and attorney and find him, then we had to serve papers on him in order to get custody. Thank goodness he took our side in the whole mess. But here in Florida, if you know who the father is, then you have to have him served with papers that you are seeking custody of the two children. It doesn't matter if they were married or not, you have to find the father and have him served too.
I think it would be safe for the children to get custody I don't know what the situation is. But it should be written by the judge who the children should reside with and when visitation days and hours between a mediator or whatever their called. It's just safe for the children. I remember my son was taken my his father and I got so scared because the judge ordered him to stay with my son at his mothers house. And he took off to his house far and I didn't have a car to go and get him. When I called the police they couldn't do nothing because I didn't have proof of the court order.
guessing you have reason to believe your daughter is not a good mother? I suppose you could get a lawyer..
Do I have a legal case?
I had an affair before i married my husband, he found out about it just before we married. A few weeks later unbeknown to my husband i started the affair again, it finished a couple of weeks ago. He still doesn't know, however he had been receiving anonymous phone calls. I then fell out with my ex lover and i now know that the phone calls were from him trying to tell my husband about us to warn him. Would i still have a case to take legal action against him for the phone calls?Do I have a legal case?
I'm intrigued. You can get a telephone put into a trailer now?Do I have a legal case?
the only thing i would do is put a block on his number if you can...you will not only open a big can of worms that you might not want opened but you just might lose your husband in the process so think really hard about what you want and what you do before doing anything....and do yourself a favour stop cheating ...aren't you worried about getting an STD or AIDS and then not only getting that yourself but giving it to your husband...if you are not happy with your marriage get out of it before you start another relationship
You are worried about the ex-lover rolling over on you and not about the fact you cheated? That should be the least of your worries. If you play you have to assume you will pay. Spend your time and energy on your husband and become a real woman and be his wife.
You are worried about the damn phone calls!!!!!????? How bout you start thinking how it's not ok to have an affair while your married! To answer this silly question, you could try, but the judge will just laugh it off!
No. If he is telling your husband then there is nothing you can do about it. He isn't lying about what occurred so there is no legal action to take.
You were just as big a part of it as he was so you can't come back on him. He is just telling the truth.
No, because he didn't say anything about you that wasn't true. Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about this if you weren't cheating on your husband.
You have a case of Selfish Witch Syndrome. Symptoms: only concerned with ones self, uses other people, betrays and deceives.
Nope, he didn't do anything wrong. If he ruins your ';marriage'; it's based on truth.
NO...... why would you even think that
your huuby deserves to know the the truth about the trash he got
I'm intrigued. You can get a telephone put into a trailer now?Do I have a legal case?
the only thing i would do is put a block on his number if you can...you will not only open a big can of worms that you might not want opened but you just might lose your husband in the process so think really hard about what you want and what you do before doing anything....and do yourself a favour stop cheating ...aren't you worried about getting an STD or AIDS and then not only getting that yourself but giving it to your husband...if you are not happy with your marriage get out of it before you start another relationship
You are worried about the ex-lover rolling over on you and not about the fact you cheated? That should be the least of your worries. If you play you have to assume you will pay. Spend your time and energy on your husband and become a real woman and be his wife.
You are worried about the damn phone calls!!!!!????? How bout you start thinking how it's not ok to have an affair while your married! To answer this silly question, you could try, but the judge will just laugh it off!
No. If he is telling your husband then there is nothing you can do about it. He isn't lying about what occurred so there is no legal action to take.
You were just as big a part of it as he was so you can't come back on him. He is just telling the truth.
No, because he didn't say anything about you that wasn't true. Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about this if you weren't cheating on your husband.
You have a case of Selfish Witch Syndrome. Symptoms: only concerned with ones self, uses other people, betrays and deceives.
Nope, he didn't do anything wrong. If he ruins your ';marriage'; it's based on truth.
NO...... why would you even think that
your huuby deserves to know the the truth about the trash he got
What earlier Supreme Court case allowed segregation to become legal in the United States?
u.s historyWhat earlier Supreme Court case allowed segregation to become legal in the United States?
Plessy v. Ferguson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._F鈥?/a>What earlier Supreme Court case allowed segregation to become legal in the United States?
It was either Brown v. Board of Education or Plessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. Ferguson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._F鈥?/a>What earlier Supreme Court case allowed segregation to become legal in the United States?
It was either Brown v. Board of Education or Plessy v. Ferguson
My ex posted a legal notice, from the judge in our case on her facebook page. Is it illegal to do that?
We are going through a child support dispute and she posted one of the documents on a public comments area? Is it illegal to post court documents on such a medium? Thanks for your help.My ex posted a legal notice, from the judge in our case on her facebook page. Is it illegal to do that?
Unless there is a ';gag order'; from the judge, this is public information.My ex posted a legal notice, from the judge in our case on her facebook page. Is it illegal to do that?
All court documents are public knowledge. In theory, if you know the case number to any file, you can go to the court house and ask to look at it.
They are public record, but if you can show that this was done to harass or slander your reputation you may have legal cause for action in a civil suite. Call your atty to find out.
Unless there's a particular law in your area or the records have been sealed for some reason, court documents are concidered public record.
Legal documents are public records.
Unless there is a ';gag order'; from the judge, this is public information.My ex posted a legal notice, from the judge in our case on her facebook page. Is it illegal to do that?
All court documents are public knowledge. In theory, if you know the case number to any file, you can go to the court house and ask to look at it.
They are public record, but if you can show that this was done to harass or slander your reputation you may have legal cause for action in a civil suite. Call your atty to find out.
Unless there's a particular law in your area or the records have been sealed for some reason, court documents are concidered public record.
Legal documents are public records.
How is ';other income'; from a 1099 handled on a 1040 when it is reimbursement for legal fees from a case won?
I believe there is a line on the 1040 for ';Other Income';
Is a affidavit of character legal to use in a ky. legal case?
Judge not and you will not be judged; do not condemn and pronounce guilty, and you will not be condemned and pronounced guilty; acquit and forgive and you will be acquitted and forgiven.
Is it legal for a state prosecuter to discuss a case with the defense attorney?
Is it legal for a state prosecuter and defense attorney to discuss the case out of court? I found out the Defense Attorney was requesting to meet the State Attorny ( prosecuter ) assigned to the case in which I am a victim in, out of court. The Defense Attorney also stated to say '; HI'; to the state attornys sister ( conflict of interest?)Is it legal for a state prosecuter to discuss a case with the defense attorney?
Of course that's legal. The only rule is against the prosecutor speaking directly to the accused without his/her attorney present. As the other poster noted, almost all plea bargains are reached outside of court in an informal setting. Attorneys from both sides frequently talk to each other during their cases - both criminal and civil.
As for the prosecutor saying his to the defense attorney's sister, well, all I can guess is that its a small town or they are in some way acquainted. In my town, I know quite a few close family members of attorneys I routinely practice against. Its not a show of bias, its just because its a smaller town and I routinely see these people at restaurants, bars, etc. and say hi to be polite.Is it legal for a state prosecuter to discuss a case with the defense attorney?
Not only legal, it is proper. That is how plea arrangements are reached.eye look
Of course that's legal. The only rule is against the prosecutor speaking directly to the accused without his/her attorney present. As the other poster noted, almost all plea bargains are reached outside of court in an informal setting. Attorneys from both sides frequently talk to each other during their cases - both criminal and civil.
As for the prosecutor saying his to the defense attorney's sister, well, all I can guess is that its a small town or they are in some way acquainted. In my town, I know quite a few close family members of attorneys I routinely practice against. Its not a show of bias, its just because its a smaller town and I routinely see these people at restaurants, bars, etc. and say hi to be polite.Is it legal for a state prosecuter to discuss a case with the defense attorney?
Not only legal, it is proper. That is how plea arrangements are reached.
Anyone got URLs for legal case law sites?
I have tried a lot of these so-called case law sites and they are rubbish, but I can't afford a subscription site either. Any help would be appreciated, Thanks.Anyone got URLs for legal case law sites?
You can check out megalaw.com and findlaw.com. They have both free and paid search engines. I have been in law enforcement 9 years and have used both sites and found them helpful but not the greatest without a paid subscription. On their homepage, just select the state under state law and it should direct you to where you want to go. Good luck!Anyone got URLs for legal case law sites?
I think this is the best one:
Find Law
You can check out megalaw.com and findlaw.com. They have both free and paid search engines. I have been in law enforcement 9 years and have used both sites and found them helpful but not the greatest without a paid subscription. On their homepage, just select the state under state law and it should direct you to where you want to go. Good luck!Anyone got URLs for legal case law sites?
I think this is the best one:
Find Law
Is it legal to leave the philippines if a criminal case is still pending in the court of appeals ?
a friend left the philippines while hew was on bail and is going to re-enter the country.will there be any legal problems?Is it legal to leave the philippines if a criminal case is still pending in the court of appeals ?
Ethically speaking, if he was out on bail, he shouldnt have left the country, because bail only offers temporary liberty - which means he has to be 'on-call' shall there be a hearing re his case.
But considering the present judicial system in the philippines, it is just too easy to assume that most rules are not being implemented nor monitored by the concerned authorities. One may need to petition for a Hold Departure Order from the court to oblige the authorities to stop someone from getting out of the country.
Criminal cases (unlike civil cases) had to be initiated with a preliminary investigation, and your friend, being granted with the privilege of bail, apparently hadnt committed a grave offense, otherwise, he wouldnt have been given that option. And he is on his way back right? I doubt it if he'll be arrested or something (upon his arrival) unless otherwise, there had been an outstanding arrest warrant that was issued against him, subsequential to his bail.Is it legal to leave the philippines if a criminal case is still pending in the court of appeals ?
No, there will be no legal problems, as long as there is no hold departure order against him isssued by the courts
Excuse me but he said the case is pending in the court of appeals so there will be no more scheduled hearings to be set. And there will be no pending warrants of arrest because he is out on bail
Again, he will not be detained by immigration authoritiesif there is no hold departure order against him.
if he is not going to attend the scheduled court hearings, he would be issued a warrant of arrest. But if his departure was for health reason, the court may give some grace period until he returns. And if he didn't, if the country he was allowed to go have treaties with the grp, he would be arrested there and deported back here.
if theres no warrant of arrest filed to yer friend then its a green sign, re entering the country is a different story yyer friend might be arrested at immigration
is it really ye mate with legal problems and not yer frnd???
He will likely be arrested at immigration checkpoint upon arrival.
Ethically speaking, if he was out on bail, he shouldnt have left the country, because bail only offers temporary liberty - which means he has to be 'on-call' shall there be a hearing re his case.
But considering the present judicial system in the philippines, it is just too easy to assume that most rules are not being implemented nor monitored by the concerned authorities. One may need to petition for a Hold Departure Order from the court to oblige the authorities to stop someone from getting out of the country.
Criminal cases (unlike civil cases) had to be initiated with a preliminary investigation, and your friend, being granted with the privilege of bail, apparently hadnt committed a grave offense, otherwise, he wouldnt have been given that option. And he is on his way back right? I doubt it if he'll be arrested or something (upon his arrival) unless otherwise, there had been an outstanding arrest warrant that was issued against him, subsequential to his bail.Is it legal to leave the philippines if a criminal case is still pending in the court of appeals ?
No, there will be no legal problems, as long as there is no hold departure order against him isssued by the courts
Excuse me but he said the case is pending in the court of appeals so there will be no more scheduled hearings to be set. And there will be no pending warrants of arrest because he is out on bail
Again, he will not be detained by immigration authoritiesif there is no hold departure order against him.
if he is not going to attend the scheduled court hearings, he would be issued a warrant of arrest. But if his departure was for health reason, the court may give some grace period until he returns. And if he didn't, if the country he was allowed to go have treaties with the grp, he would be arrested there and deported back here.
if theres no warrant of arrest filed to yer friend then its a green sign, re entering the country is a different story yyer friend might be arrested at immigration
is it really ye mate with legal problems and not yer frnd???
He will likely be arrested at immigration checkpoint upon arrival.
How do i go about moving a legal case in federal court?
I think your question is a little too vague.. please include a little more information.. the specifics of the case, what and/or how you want to move it, and we'll be able to help you out.
Research buffs - help me find this PA legal case?
I read on an ';interesting fact'; calendar that in 1871, a Pennsylvania man sued ';Satan and his Staff'; for making his life miserable. The case was thrown out of course.
Is there any research buffs out there that can find more information on this legal case? Could it have been 1971?Research buffs - help me find this PA legal case?
It was 1971 and check out my sources below the message.
United States ex rel. Mayo v. Satan %26amp; His Staff, 54 F.R.D. 282 (W.D. Pa. 1971).
[Misc. No. 5357; United States District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania, Dec. 3, 1971.]
The information can be found on the following sources:Research buffs - help me find this PA legal case?
Mayo v. Satan and His Staff, 54 F.R.D. 282 (W.D. Pa. 1971)
Ok. Somebody beat me too it. And with better links.eye look
Is there any research buffs out there that can find more information on this legal case? Could it have been 1971?Research buffs - help me find this PA legal case?
It was 1971 and check out my sources below the message.
United States ex rel. Mayo v. Satan %26amp; His Staff, 54 F.R.D. 282 (W.D. Pa. 1971).
[Misc. No. 5357; United States District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania, Dec. 3, 1971.]
The information can be found on the following sources:Research buffs - help me find this PA legal case?
Mayo v. Satan and His Staff, 54 F.R.D. 282 (W.D. Pa. 1971)
Ok. Somebody beat me too it. And with better links.
Retained lawyer had legal secretary who used to work as legal secretary for opposing lawyer handling our case?
Is that legal, or does something seem fishy?Retained lawyer had legal secretary who used to work as legal secretary for opposing lawyer handling our case?
If you are concerned that the legal secretary is some kind of spy for the other lawyer I wouldn't worry about it too much. As long as your lawyer is aware that the legal secretary used to work for the opposing lawyer he or she can take reasonable steps to ensure there is no violation of client confidentiality.
Additionally if the secretary and her the opposing lawyer were to conspire in such a manner it would constitute a violation of the law as well as ethics guidelines for lawyers which would result in mistrial, expose both of them to fines and criminal prosecution, civil claims by you and your lawyer, and disbarment for the opposing lawyer.
There is nothing illegal in and of itself about legal support staff moving from one lawyer as an employer to another. If support staff moves from one lawyer to an opposing lawyer during a litigation or transaction between the clients of the lawyers, that might raise issues about preserving client confidentiality and trial/negotiation strategies that the former employing lawyer could raise but in your situation if the legal secretary was not an employee of the opposing lawyer during your litigation there is no such issue.
EDIT: Actually it's mailaccount63 that is wrong and has clearly illustrated that she has no understanding of legal ethics as it applies to conflicts of interests which is probably why she doesn't even bother to explain why she thinks there is a conflict of interest.
It is an indisputable FACT that some legal support staff that work at mid-sized to large law firms do move from firm to firm over the course of years and it is also an indisputable FACT that during the course of their work many of them end up working with attorneys at the firm that are in engaged in a litigation with attorneys of a firm where they used to work.
Conflict of interest covers competing client interests not competing interests of one's current lawyer employer and one's former lawyer employer. In this situation, the legal secretary's actual knowledge about the opposing party being represented that arises from her having worked for the other attorney is the only relevant factor in determining whether there is a conflict of interest. If she has none then there is no conflict of interest so unless she switched employers during the litigation it's highly unlikely that there is any conflict of interest. Even if she did switch employers during the litigation, if she wasn't privy to any client information while she was working for the other lawyer, there is no conflict of interest. If I was your lawyer in that situation however, I would probably get another secretary and would want a waiver from the other side.Retained lawyer had legal secretary who used to work as legal secretary for opposing lawyer handling our case?
Previous poster ';Charis P'; is wrong.
This is a definite ';Conflict Of Interest';. This Legal Secretary should not be working on your case at all. This is not ethical. If the lawyer doesn't remove the Legal Secretary from working on your case, you should get another lawyer asap! I would get another lawyer anyway - you want an ethical lawyer so something doesn't come back later and bite you in the butt.
If this Legal Secretary has any formal training at all, she knows she should be removed from working on your matter. Look at your gut response - it is also just common sense.
If you are concerned that the legal secretary is some kind of spy for the other lawyer I wouldn't worry about it too much. As long as your lawyer is aware that the legal secretary used to work for the opposing lawyer he or she can take reasonable steps to ensure there is no violation of client confidentiality.
Additionally if the secretary and her the opposing lawyer were to conspire in such a manner it would constitute a violation of the law as well as ethics guidelines for lawyers which would result in mistrial, expose both of them to fines and criminal prosecution, civil claims by you and your lawyer, and disbarment for the opposing lawyer.
There is nothing illegal in and of itself about legal support staff moving from one lawyer as an employer to another. If support staff moves from one lawyer to an opposing lawyer during a litigation or transaction between the clients of the lawyers, that might raise issues about preserving client confidentiality and trial/negotiation strategies that the former employing lawyer could raise but in your situation if the legal secretary was not an employee of the opposing lawyer during your litigation there is no such issue.
EDIT: Actually it's mailaccount63 that is wrong and has clearly illustrated that she has no understanding of legal ethics as it applies to conflicts of interests which is probably why she doesn't even bother to explain why she thinks there is a conflict of interest.
It is an indisputable FACT that some legal support staff that work at mid-sized to large law firms do move from firm to firm over the course of years and it is also an indisputable FACT that during the course of their work many of them end up working with attorneys at the firm that are in engaged in a litigation with attorneys of a firm where they used to work.
Conflict of interest covers competing client interests not competing interests of one's current lawyer employer and one's former lawyer employer. In this situation, the legal secretary's actual knowledge about the opposing party being represented that arises from her having worked for the other attorney is the only relevant factor in determining whether there is a conflict of interest. If she has none then there is no conflict of interest so unless she switched employers during the litigation it's highly unlikely that there is any conflict of interest. Even if she did switch employers during the litigation, if she wasn't privy to any client information while she was working for the other lawyer, there is no conflict of interest. If I was your lawyer in that situation however, I would probably get another secretary and would want a waiver from the other side.Retained lawyer had legal secretary who used to work as legal secretary for opposing lawyer handling our case?
Previous poster ';Charis P'; is wrong.
This is a definite ';Conflict Of Interest';. This Legal Secretary should not be working on your case at all. This is not ethical. If the lawyer doesn't remove the Legal Secretary from working on your case, you should get another lawyer asap! I would get another lawyer anyway - you want an ethical lawyer so something doesn't come back later and bite you in the butt.
If this Legal Secretary has any formal training at all, she knows she should be removed from working on your matter. Look at your gut response - it is also just common sense.
I need legal advice on an injury case that took place out of country?
I was injured skiing in Japan. I am now back in Canada recovering. How can I sue for negligence from here to recover lost wages/pain and suffering? Is it possible? Is it expensive?
Please help!I need legal advice on an injury case that took place out of country?
The laws in Japan will be considerably different to those common law rights found in BC. The Japanese system of law is a civil law jurisdiction (so is Quebec's). The liability of the persons you think are responsible for causing your injury will be dictated in Japan by codified rules of law. In fact, they may not owe you any responsibility at all. You need a lawyer.
Please help!I need legal advice on an injury case that took place out of country?
The laws in Japan will be considerably different to those common law rights found in BC. The Japanese system of law is a civil law jurisdiction (so is Quebec's). The liability of the persons you think are responsible for causing your injury will be dictated in Japan by codified rules of law. In fact, they may not owe you any responsibility at all. You need a lawyer.
I have a legal case with lots of emails in it. Who can help me?
if in your country the e-mail can to be bring to a trial like a prove, you don't have any problem
Is there legal help in Indiana for a single mom involved in a custody case?
I am a single mother of a small child, and am facing lenghty custody battle. I work at home, as I very much want to be with my child and have a chance to raise her, but this has put me on a limited income where there is not extra room in the budget for legal fees.
Are there any orginizations out there that will help with free or reduced attorney fees?
I really need legal support to help, as the father of my child has a criminal history, drug abuse in the family, child molestor in the family, and her father constantly uses her as a tool just to start trouble, and to top it off my child does not want to go with her father (throws a fit everytime he comes over).
Any answers are appreciated.
Thank you!Is there legal help in Indiana for a single mom involved in a custody case?
Check with the court, you may qualify for a court appointed attorney if you are low enough income.
Are there any orginizations out there that will help with free or reduced attorney fees?
I really need legal support to help, as the father of my child has a criminal history, drug abuse in the family, child molestor in the family, and her father constantly uses her as a tool just to start trouble, and to top it off my child does not want to go with her father (throws a fit everytime he comes over).
Any answers are appreciated.
Thank you!Is there legal help in Indiana for a single mom involved in a custody case?
Check with the court, you may qualify for a court appointed attorney if you are low enough income.
How much would legal fees be expected to cost for represenation in a rape and kidnapping case?
I'm in a debate about how much the legal fees for the 3 Duke lacrosse players could end up costing. Anyone know of any online resources that can give estimates on attorney fees?How much would legal fees be expected to cost for represenation in a rape and kidnapping case?
Maybe 50K each?
Maybe 50K each?
Is it now legal to own an assault rifle in Cincinnati, Ohio? Does recent Supreme Court case overrule the city?
I can't find any detailed information on the current situation with assault rifle bans in Cincinnati. I know a recent court case decision by the Ohio Supreme Court overruled certain aspects of city's laws but I wasn't sure what was included in that. Thanks.Is it now legal to own an assault rifle in Cincinnati, Ohio? Does recent Supreme Court case overrule the city?
In Cincinnati you are NOT allowed to have an assault rifle. The recent court decision was to NOT overturn the weapons ban. Although it can't last forever considering the recent DC case and the expiration of the National Assault Weapons Ban. Here is an excerpt from the Buckeye Firearm Association's response to the ruling.
Buckeye Firearms Association announced today that they regret the Ohio Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in the Cincinnati vs. Baskin case, upholding that city’s assault weapon ban. However, the decision was not unexpected and the preemption language in H.B. 347 addresses every one of the Court’s criteria as set forth in the Baskin opinion. The reason the preemption language was changed between the “dash 1” version and the “dash 2” version that ended up passing was in anticipation of this decision.
eye look
In Cincinnati you are NOT allowed to have an assault rifle. The recent court decision was to NOT overturn the weapons ban. Although it can't last forever considering the recent DC case and the expiration of the National Assault Weapons Ban. Here is an excerpt from the Buckeye Firearm Association's response to the ruling.
Buckeye Firearms Association announced today that they regret the Ohio Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in the Cincinnati vs. Baskin case, upholding that city’s assault weapon ban. However, the decision was not unexpected and the preemption language in H.B. 347 addresses every one of the Court’s criteria as set forth in the Baskin opinion. The reason the preemption language was changed between the “dash 1” version and the “dash 2” version that ended up passing was in anticipation of this decision.
What is deferred case in legal terms?
I got a ticket for selling alcohol in oklahoma in 2004. I paid the fine and other formalities. Now i want it to be taken off from the records. How can I do?. When I called the oklahoma courts they said it is deferred caseWhat is deferred case in legal terms?
I don't know the legal wording but it goes a little something like this. For instance i steal some candy from a store,instead gaetting the two years in jail the judge can defer the case say for a year,an in that yaers time if you keep your nose clean,meaning no more trouble with the law that said case will be swept under the rug.Please don't take my words as gosple look it up.
I don't know the legal wording but it goes a little something like this. For instance i steal some candy from a store,instead gaetting the two years in jail the judge can defer the case say for a year,an in that yaers time if you keep your nose clean,meaning no more trouble with the law that said case will be swept under the rug.Please don't take my words as gosple look it up.
What are the Legal and Ethical issues of the Dr Haneef case?
If possible, can you please provide me with around 5 dot points each?What are the Legal and Ethical issues of the Dr Haneef case?
Well, I am no legal eagle but it is not specifically Dr Haneef's case that is the problem, it is the Terrorism Laws themselves (or at least, the way they have been used).
These laws give all the power to the Police and the Government and leave the accused with no rights at all!
* assumed guilty until proved innocent. (and even then still to be vilified and suspected by 'face-saving' politicians)
* no right to swift justice (can be detained as long as they want or need to dig up some flimsy evidence)
* detained on suspicion alone without charge or evidence.
* have your name smeared in the media so that you are tried, sentenced and condemned before you have had a chance to defend yourself.
* In Australia, evidently, it is a crime to be related to someone who is suspected of being a criminal.
* Now, it is suspicious to buy a one way ticket to the country of your birth from Australia.
* Apparently, it is suspicious to want to leave Australia and go home to see your family, wife and new born baby as soon as you have been released from an ordeal of being accused and detained FOR NO REASON!What are the Legal and Ethical issues of the Dr Haneef case?
It's unethical that he was detained for twelve days without being charged with a crime.
Well, I am no legal eagle but it is not specifically Dr Haneef's case that is the problem, it is the Terrorism Laws themselves (or at least, the way they have been used).
These laws give all the power to the Police and the Government and leave the accused with no rights at all!
* assumed guilty until proved innocent. (and even then still to be vilified and suspected by 'face-saving' politicians)
* no right to swift justice (can be detained as long as they want or need to dig up some flimsy evidence)
* detained on suspicion alone without charge or evidence.
* have your name smeared in the media so that you are tried, sentenced and condemned before you have had a chance to defend yourself.
* In Australia, evidently, it is a crime to be related to someone who is suspected of being a criminal.
* Now, it is suspicious to buy a one way ticket to the country of your birth from Australia.
* Apparently, it is suspicious to want to leave Australia and go home to see your family, wife and new born baby as soon as you have been released from an ordeal of being accused and detained FOR NO REASON!What are the Legal and Ethical issues of the Dr Haneef case?
It's unethical that he was detained for twelve days without being charged with a crime.
Need legal advice about sexual abuse cases in California!!?
I need to find legal resources about sexual abuse cases within the family. Victim is 5 yr. old girl and the one who did the crime is a 10 yr. old boy. I need to know about my rights as a parent. I need to know who I should talk to and what I should do first. Maybe a name of a good Lawyer in the San Francisco Bay Area who deals with this sort of thing? I need help!Need legal advice about sexual abuse cases in California!!?
First thing is to call the police. I know he's ten but call the police. They'll have procedures to follow and get the perpetrator treated. Second, make certain that your daughter has counseling available to her. Here is a web site: http://therapists.psychologytoday.com/pp鈥?/a>
Second, here is a child abuse web site that will have help available:
http://www.childhelpusa.org/
Do whatever you need to do to protect the child.
First thing is to call the police. I know he's ten but call the police. They'll have procedures to follow and get the perpetrator treated. Second, make certain that your daughter has counseling available to her. Here is a web site: http://therapists.psychologytoday.com/pp鈥?/a>
Second, here is a child abuse web site that will have help available:
http://www.childhelpusa.org/
Do whatever you need to do to protect the child.
Is it legal to file a trespass in this case?
So my roommates and I are having a dispute on a lot of things. They left for the weekend and came back to somecrap in their toilet, which no one that I know did it. So they put a trespass charge on my boyfriend without the consent of me or my sister, but my other two roomates consented to, trying to retaliate for us ';using'; their toliet when we really didn't. I was wondering if that is legal and right according to the Iowa law?Is it legal to file a trespass in this case?
I'll keep my opinion out and give you straight from the Iowa law on Trespassing. If he actually got the charge, these are the excerpts I'm assuming the Police used in order to do it. In the source I've placed the link to this particualr Iowa law.
Trespass is defined as follows in Iowa Code 搂 716.7:
';...d. Being upon or in property and wrongfully using, removing
therefrom, altering, damaging, harassing, or placing thereon or
therein anything animate or inanimate, without the implied or actual
permission of the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession. ';
Then again, if your boyfriend had your permission to be there..
';...b. Entering or remaining upon or in property without justification
after being notified or requested to abstain from entering or to
remove or vacate therefrom by the owner, lessee, or person in lawful
possession, or the agent or employee of the owner, lessee, or person
in lawful possession, or by any peace officer, magistrate, or public
employee whose duty it is to supervise the use or maintenance of the
property. ';
Basically, you need to find out what porition of the code was used to actually write the summons for Trespassing and go from there. It could be a defense to trespass if you being a legal resident to that domicile, you gave legal concent for him to be in the home.
Enough of the legal-ese. heh Go talk to your local police or Sheriff and talk with them about the law itself. I wouldnt go into the case if its going to be prosecuted. Talk to a lawyer about it if its going in that direction.
I'll keep my opinion out and give you straight from the Iowa law on Trespassing. If he actually got the charge, these are the excerpts I'm assuming the Police used in order to do it. In the source I've placed the link to this particualr Iowa law.
Trespass is defined as follows in Iowa Code 搂 716.7:
';...d. Being upon or in property and wrongfully using, removing
therefrom, altering, damaging, harassing, or placing thereon or
therein anything animate or inanimate, without the implied or actual
permission of the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession. ';
Then again, if your boyfriend had your permission to be there..
';...b. Entering or remaining upon or in property without justification
after being notified or requested to abstain from entering or to
remove or vacate therefrom by the owner, lessee, or person in lawful
possession, or the agent or employee of the owner, lessee, or person
in lawful possession, or by any peace officer, magistrate, or public
employee whose duty it is to supervise the use or maintenance of the
property. ';
Basically, you need to find out what porition of the code was used to actually write the summons for Trespassing and go from there. It could be a defense to trespass if you being a legal resident to that domicile, you gave legal concent for him to be in the home.
Enough of the legal-ese. heh Go talk to your local police or Sheriff and talk with them about the law itself. I wouldnt go into the case if its going to be prosecuted. Talk to a lawyer about it if its going in that direction.
Wat legal action can be taken in case of a girl being kidnapped and extorted and had a narrow escape.?
Wat are the common procedures in filing a case and wat to be done after this.Wat legal action can be taken in case of a girl being kidnapped and extorted and had a narrow escape.?
Inform police about it and if they are calling u on phone for asking about money then police will tapp ur phone and will come to know the location from which they are calling and they will handle further.Wat legal action can be taken in case of a girl being kidnapped and extorted and had a narrow escape.?
It sounds like she would have a damage claim of some sort against the kidnapper.
Does the kidnapper have money?
Inform police about it and if they are calling u on phone for asking about money then police will tapp ur phone and will come to know the location from which they are calling and they will handle further.Wat legal action can be taken in case of a girl being kidnapped and extorted and had a narrow escape.?
It sounds like she would have a damage claim of some sort against the kidnapper.
Does the kidnapper have money?
What happens if you give legal guardians to another, and you have an case that has been in the courts?
and settlement will soon be awarded to custodial parent. What happens?What happens if you give legal guardians to another, and you have an case that has been in the courts?
The arrears are money you spent as guardian.
That's yours.
Any ongoing support goes to the new guardian.What happens if you give legal guardians to another, and you have an case that has been in the courts?
I could help you more if you gave more information. You would have to be the natural parent or legal guardian to be able to 'give' guardianship to another person. If custody is being reverted back to the 'custodial parent,' based on your question, that would be the natural parent or court appointed guardian. The court will usually give a set time and date to transfer the child/person to the person/s awarded custody. Failure to release/deliver the child/person can get you in serious trouble ... contempt of court charges and so on, even jail.eye look
The arrears are money you spent as guardian.
That's yours.
Any ongoing support goes to the new guardian.What happens if you give legal guardians to another, and you have an case that has been in the courts?
I could help you more if you gave more information. You would have to be the natural parent or legal guardian to be able to 'give' guardianship to another person. If custody is being reverted back to the 'custodial parent,' based on your question, that would be the natural parent or court appointed guardian. The court will usually give a set time and date to transfer the child/person to the person/s awarded custody. Failure to release/deliver the child/person can get you in serious trouble ... contempt of court charges and so on, even jail.
Where can i get the information for free and easily for a legal litigation case that occured in Florida 2005?
You did not specify what type of case or the county. Different courts handle different types of cases. Florida is a large state with numerous counties. The reference books which publish the cases are indexed by the courts, counties, and dates. You need to be more specific than ';a legal litigation case'; in ';Florida'; ';2005';.
Where can I find legal counsel for an FMLA case in Indiana?
This would be a dispute with an employer.Where can I find legal counsel for an FMLA case in Indiana?
Hi:
Check the internet
Type your city, lawyers or Counsels or vice versa. You will bring up all kinds.
Good LuckWhere can I find legal counsel for an FMLA case in Indiana?
The FMLA, as you know, is a federal law. You have a right to representation without cost to you, so contact your state employment commission.
Hi:
Check the internet
Type your city, lawyers or Counsels or vice versa. You will bring up all kinds.
Good LuckWhere can I find legal counsel for an FMLA case in Indiana?
The FMLA, as you know, is a federal law. You have a right to representation without cost to you, so contact your state employment commission.
What is the difference in the legal definition of this two sayings, regarding a court case?
What is the difference if a case has been ';dropped'; or 'Nolle Prosequi?';
Which is better for you legally, or it doesn't matter?What is the difference in the legal definition of this two sayings, regarding a court case?
nolle prosequi:
Latin for ';we shall no longer prosecute,'; which is a declaration made to the judge by a prosecutor in a criminal case (or by a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit) either before or during trial, meaning the case against the defendant is being dropped. The statement is an admission that the charges cannot be proved, that evidence has demonstrated either innocence or a fatal flaw in the prosecution's claim or the district attorney has become convinced the accused is innocent.
------------
';Nolle prosequi is a formal entry on the record by the prosecuting officer by which he declares that he will not prosecute the case further, either as to some of the counts of the indictment, or as to part of a divisible count, or as to some of the persons accused, or altogether. It is a judicial determination in favor of accused and against his conviction, but it is not an acquittal, nor is it equivalent to a pardon.'; 22A C.J.S. Criminal Law 搂 419, at 1 (1989).
-------------
dropped/dismissed:
dismiss
v. the ruling by a judge that all or a portion (one or more of the causes of action) of the plaintiff's lawsuit is terminated (thrown out) at that point without further evidence or testimony. This judgment may be made before, during or at the end of a trial, when the judge becomes convinced that the plaintiff has not and cannot prove his/her/its case. This can be based on the complaint failing to allege a cause of action, on a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff's opening statement of what will be proved, or on some development in the evidence by either side which bars judgment for the plaintiff. The judge may dismiss on his own or upon motion by the defendant. The plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss a cause of action before or during trial if the case is settled, if it is not provable or trial strategy dictates getting rid of a weak claim. A defendant may be ';dismissed'; from a lawsuit, meaning the suit is dropped against that party.
Which is better for you legally, or it doesn't matter?What is the difference in the legal definition of this two sayings, regarding a court case?
nolle prosequi:
Latin for ';we shall no longer prosecute,'; which is a declaration made to the judge by a prosecutor in a criminal case (or by a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit) either before or during trial, meaning the case against the defendant is being dropped. The statement is an admission that the charges cannot be proved, that evidence has demonstrated either innocence or a fatal flaw in the prosecution's claim or the district attorney has become convinced the accused is innocent.
------------
';Nolle prosequi is a formal entry on the record by the prosecuting officer by which he declares that he will not prosecute the case further, either as to some of the counts of the indictment, or as to part of a divisible count, or as to some of the persons accused, or altogether. It is a judicial determination in favor of accused and against his conviction, but it is not an acquittal, nor is it equivalent to a pardon.'; 22A C.J.S. Criminal Law 搂 419, at 1 (1989).
-------------
dropped/dismissed:
dismiss
v. the ruling by a judge that all or a portion (one or more of the causes of action) of the plaintiff's lawsuit is terminated (thrown out) at that point without further evidence or testimony. This judgment may be made before, during or at the end of a trial, when the judge becomes convinced that the plaintiff has not and cannot prove his/her/its case. This can be based on the complaint failing to allege a cause of action, on a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff's opening statement of what will be proved, or on some development in the evidence by either side which bars judgment for the plaintiff. The judge may dismiss on his own or upon motion by the defendant. The plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss a cause of action before or during trial if the case is settled, if it is not provable or trial strategy dictates getting rid of a weak claim. A defendant may be ';dismissed'; from a lawsuit, meaning the suit is dropped against that party.
Is it legal to speak to a judge about your case before it goes to court?
I think that my ex did this.Is it legal to speak to a judge about your case before it goes to court?
No, it is not legal. Complain to the state's committee on judicial ethics if you have evidence of this.Is it legal to speak to a judge about your case before it goes to court?
I haven't heard that its Illegal
in case of ondinary man the person whoes case is is not allowed but if thy are wakil then it can be possible
Absolutely not. As lahocky says such ex parte communications are not permitted. The judge should prohibit it. If it occurs inadvertantly the judge is obligated to notify all sides of what happened and the contents of any such communication so the opposing party may take such remedial action as he may deem necessary. If you believe it happened notify your attorney immediately.
If it's part of a motion before the court, certainly. If they're ';golfing buddies'; the judge should recuse him or her self.
yes you should ask for a new judge and then go speak to him/her first.
No, it si not legal to do so - this could be what's called in English law the perversion of justice, if he was attempting, or could be interpreted as having, influenced the judicial process or the outcome.
He could I think, in England, speak to the Clerk to the Justices, who is a court official, about proceudres and times etc, but would usually do that via a solicitor or lawyer.
Write to the Court asking if this is the case, i.e. is it acceptable in general to do this.
Do it quickly.
Do not make any accusations in your letter, do not name names, just ask general questions.
Good luck
No...that is considered EX PARTE communication and NOT allowed.
It is not illegal in the sense that it is a violation of criminal law. However, it is a violation of judicial ethics for a party to a case to talk to the judge about the case without the other side present.
If it can be proved, it is a good reason to get the judge removed from the case and for it to be assigned to another judge. If the case it over and the court made any decisions against you, it could be a reason to get the court's rulings overturned and get the case assigned to another judge.
Why would he talk to the judge before hand, and why would you think this?
the only time it is legal is if a settlement is reached on an issue before the court date. that is what my sister inlaw say's and she is a barrister.
No, it is not legal. Complain to the state's committee on judicial ethics if you have evidence of this.Is it legal to speak to a judge about your case before it goes to court?
I haven't heard that its Illegal
in case of ondinary man the person whoes case is is not allowed but if thy are wakil then it can be possible
Absolutely not. As lahocky says such ex parte communications are not permitted. The judge should prohibit it. If it occurs inadvertantly the judge is obligated to notify all sides of what happened and the contents of any such communication so the opposing party may take such remedial action as he may deem necessary. If you believe it happened notify your attorney immediately.
If it's part of a motion before the court, certainly. If they're ';golfing buddies'; the judge should recuse him or her self.
yes you should ask for a new judge and then go speak to him/her first.
No, it si not legal to do so - this could be what's called in English law the perversion of justice, if he was attempting, or could be interpreted as having, influenced the judicial process or the outcome.
He could I think, in England, speak to the Clerk to the Justices, who is a court official, about proceudres and times etc, but would usually do that via a solicitor or lawyer.
Write to the Court asking if this is the case, i.e. is it acceptable in general to do this.
Do it quickly.
Do not make any accusations in your letter, do not name names, just ask general questions.
Good luck
No...that is considered EX PARTE communication and NOT allowed.
It is not illegal in the sense that it is a violation of criminal law. However, it is a violation of judicial ethics for a party to a case to talk to the judge about the case without the other side present.
If it can be proved, it is a good reason to get the judge removed from the case and for it to be assigned to another judge. If the case it over and the court made any decisions against you, it could be a reason to get the court's rulings overturned and get the case assigned to another judge.
Why would he talk to the judge before hand, and why would you think this?
the only time it is legal is if a settlement is reached on an issue before the court date. that is what my sister inlaw say's and she is a barrister.
Is it legal for Judges to change during a court case?
We started a Criminal Felony Case with One Judge, now the next trial date is with a different Judge.Is it legal for Judges to change during a court case?
Like any workplace, people get sick, get transferred, die, go on vacations, have family time off, compassionate leave etc.
Life happens.
Usually, a change is communicated to you through your lawyer.
If your lawyer did not , in turn communicate this change to you, you can file a complaint against your lawyer.Is it legal for Judges to change during a court case?
Happens all the time. In my county one judge handles the case from arraignment to sentencing. In other counties, one judge handles arraingment. Another handles bail hearings. A third handles motion hearings and a fourt handles trial and sentencing. There are advantages and disadvantages to both systems.
depends on the case of venues. The judge has the right to turn whatever case over to any other judge that they feel would be best at handled. If the judge has their calendar full then another judge will hear the case and all shall be done in fairness to the parties involved.
Yes. If there is a conflict of interest. He may know something about the case or has been told something about the case before it began.
Yes, it is legal. A judge can withdraw from a case any time.
Like any workplace, people get sick, get transferred, die, go on vacations, have family time off, compassionate leave etc.
Life happens.
Usually, a change is communicated to you through your lawyer.
If your lawyer did not , in turn communicate this change to you, you can file a complaint against your lawyer.Is it legal for Judges to change during a court case?
Happens all the time. In my county one judge handles the case from arraignment to sentencing. In other counties, one judge handles arraingment. Another handles bail hearings. A third handles motion hearings and a fourt handles trial and sentencing. There are advantages and disadvantages to both systems.
depends on the case of venues. The judge has the right to turn whatever case over to any other judge that they feel would be best at handled. If the judge has their calendar full then another judge will hear the case and all shall be done in fairness to the parties involved.
Yes. If there is a conflict of interest. He may know something about the case or has been told something about the case before it began.
Yes, it is legal. A judge can withdraw from a case any time.
What are Legal requirement for FIR in case of accident by vehical in India?
What effect on my accident case if I don't have vehical number mention in FIR?What are Legal requirement for FIR in case of accident by vehical in India?
FIR is the short form of your first information report. It makes no difference to the FIR, if, you have forgot to mention the vehicle no in it. That can be ascertained by IO during the course of his investigation on the matter at any later stage.What are Legal requirement for FIR in case of accident by vehical in India?
Indian law, I believe, requires that you either:
A. bring a woman with a red dot on her forehead with you as a witness.
OR
B. wrap a bathtowel around your head and buy a convenience store, motel and/or gas station.baby sunscreen
FIR is the short form of your first information report. It makes no difference to the FIR, if, you have forgot to mention the vehicle no in it. That can be ascertained by IO during the course of his investigation on the matter at any later stage.What are Legal requirement for FIR in case of accident by vehical in India?
Indian law, I believe, requires that you either:
A. bring a woman with a red dot on her forehead with you as a witness.
OR
B. wrap a bathtowel around your head and buy a convenience store, motel and/or gas station.
Why do women fight for abortion to be legal in case of rape or incest?
when in reality people who get abortions because of rape or incest only make up 3 percent of the population of people who have abortions. Most people get it because it would inconvienence them or they are not financially ready. Should some responsibility be taken on the mothers part for not preventing it with birth control or condoms and if people are not ready to have a baby why are they so ready to lay down and have sex fully knowing that there could be a possibility of having a child? Please share your thoughts if i was a doctor i would say this
patient: um i want an abortion
Doc:do you know how babies are made?
Patient:yes
Doc did you know that when you have sex with somebody and they ejaculate in you you could get pregnant
yes
Doc:so now you want me to kill this baby basicaly cause you thought more about your sexual needs being met rather then the consequences of it huh
Patient: well i guess so
Doc: well in that case no i will not perform an abortion on youWhy do women fight for abortion to be legal in case of rape or incest?
Even though I'm completely against abortion, I understand and believe someone should have the option if they were raped and/or if it was incest.
Otherwise, why are you going to do what MAKES a baby, if you aren't ready to HAVE baby?
People need to learn to take responsibility for their actions.
If you aren't ready to take care of a child, keep your goddamn legs closed.
Short and sweet.Why do women fight for abortion to be legal in case of rape or incest?
Hey, considering you believe so strongly in your pro-life nonsense, wouldn't it make sense to put the time and effort into proper grammar and punctuation?
Ok, here is MY little scenario.
The mother wants an abortion, but due to new laws I am making up for a hypothetical purpose she cannot have one. She is now forced to raise a child possibly by herself, and probably into poverty as most people who get abortions aren't rich. The mother is now being over worked and over stressed because she has to work 3 jobs to support a kid she doesn't even love. As a result she has a breakdown and decides to kill her child, and maybe herself.
Oh and by the way, you would never be a doctor as you apparently have the mental capacity of a grapefruit.
Cheap shot.
A provocative one-liner followed by a less than subtle anti-abortion pitch.
I hold no moral judgment over the whole abortion issue.
But if you were carrying the child of the man that raped you, to have to continue your life looking for and caring for the constant reminder of the evil deed that was perpetrated upon you, would you perhaps regard the subject of debate in a different light?
Not that I would wish it on you.
So you would condemn some one to carry a baby that was created by two of the most horrible actions that can happen to a woman?? Have you ever thought about how you would feel if you had to carry the baby of the man who raped you?? Have you ever gotten pregnant by mistake and it does happen even with women who are taking precautions. It happened to me and though I choose to carry the child who's now 15 I can't make that decision for everyone. Most of the reasons that people object to abortions is because there aren't enough white babies for all of the parents who want to adopt. If people who say that they are anti-abortion really feel that way than why don't' they adopt the babies that have disabilities or the ones who's parents carried them but now they don't want them but who are children of color.? There are thousands of children here in the states who need homes don't talk to me about abortions until you give homes to the one already here who don' t have them. When you do that than maybe I'll listen to you about abortion.
Perhaps you should ask the unwanted children who are physically and emotionally abused by parents who don't believe in abortion.
#1: It is not a ';baby'; untill it breathes on its own. Those fetal lifeforms are the responsibility of the person who's body surrounds them. NOT for you to say.
Why do you think discussing the sex lives of other people is acceptable politics?
Your question doesn't match your details.
Women fight for abortion to be legal in case of rape of incest because:
It's hard to love a child born from an illegal and emotionally scarring sexual assault. Having your DNA mingled with the DNA of someone that would rape , you'd wonder what traits got passed on to the kid as well. Every time you'd look at the kid, you'd remember the assault. You'd end up resenting a child that did nothing bad to you and it's not fair to the child.
In the case of incest, besides what I stated above, chances are that the child will be mentally or physically handicapped. If you were a woman raped by her father, would you want a mentally challenged reminder of the rape? Would you want your own father listed on the birth certificate of your child as the father of the child? Yeah, not likely.
I do agree that in OTHER cases, it'd be a lot better to prevent the pregnancy. Contraceptives aren't 100% effective though.
Regardless of how rare it is, people fight for abortion to be legal in cases of rape and incest because they don't believe anyone should be forced to have a child who is either inbred or one that they in no way participated in creating.
I think the decision to abort is a very personal one that should be left up to the pregnant woman (until such time as the child is able to physically survive independent of its mother). I don't think the state forcing women to continue pregnancies they do not want to continue would be of great benefit to society as a whole.
Yes, it is true that often people take foolish risks and then abort when they end up pregnant. Should pregnancy then be a punishment that we force on people for making bad decisions? If you would deny an abortion to a woman simply because she knew the risks of getting pregnant when she chose to have sex, would you also deny cosmetic surgery to a person who caused a car crash (maybe they'd been drinking!) and subsequently ended up disfigured, because they knew the risks of being disfigured by a car crash when they chose to get behind the wheel?
And what is the justification for outlawing the abortion of a very undeveloped, wholly dependent clump of human cells while allowing the wholesale slaughter of cows and pigs (which surely have much more capacity for independence, feeling and intelligence than a 6 week old human embryo)?
Have you ever been a victim of rape or incest?
Have worked closely with children who have been victims of both.
Witnessing the total psychological and emotional damages rape and incest has brought to these young people, then my answer is very clearly yes abortion should be there as an option for these young folk.
Cause its a traumatizing experience, and having the baby will be a reminder of it. Even having to carry it for 9months would be really hard, specially if they're young, or the rapist was a family member.
it might just 3 percent but that 3 percent still are women who had to suffer through such trauma.
no matter how small the amount of women they're still human being, they're someone's mom, sister, cousin, friend, fiance, etc.
Abortion is sometimes good, and should be legal. If the mom isn't ready to have a baby she shouldnt have it, although is really messed up that they didnt think bout the consequences and now have to kill a baby..
its even more messed for the kid to be born to a women who didn't want him/her in the first place.
or if the mom is a drug addict, the baby will be born with complications, even addicted to it mom's drug.
no child should go thru that.
the kid would feel neglect as well..
if its given up for adoption, by the time it gets adopted the kid will have to leave in foster homes, and that has to make them feel bad.
not only that but most kids who are born to parents who didnt want them have behaviorable problems, which will just get them in trouble in the future. may even end up in jail.
i know its not the same for every kid who wasn't aborted but I would rather not take the chance.
I fully agree with you about responsibility, but sometimes it is really in the kids best interest. Don't you know some people who really shouldn't be parents. While I don't agree absolutly with abortion just because it is more convienent, it really depends on the woman's situation, not just how the baby was conceived. What I think should happen is that the baby should be given up for adoption when born. But what happens if the mother doesn't take care of herself while pregnant? Should the baby be born with a crack addiction just because the mother is an asshole? And there's always the chance that instinct will kick in and the mother won't give the baby up, even though she is incapable of raising it properly. The baby shouldn't be punished for it's mother's stupidity, but that might mean never having to suffer for it to begin with
patient: um i want an abortion
Doc:do you know how babies are made?
Patient:yes
Doc did you know that when you have sex with somebody and they ejaculate in you you could get pregnant
yes
Doc:so now you want me to kill this baby basicaly cause you thought more about your sexual needs being met rather then the consequences of it huh
Patient: well i guess so
Doc: well in that case no i will not perform an abortion on youWhy do women fight for abortion to be legal in case of rape or incest?
Even though I'm completely against abortion, I understand and believe someone should have the option if they were raped and/or if it was incest.
Otherwise, why are you going to do what MAKES a baby, if you aren't ready to HAVE baby?
People need to learn to take responsibility for their actions.
If you aren't ready to take care of a child, keep your goddamn legs closed.
Short and sweet.Why do women fight for abortion to be legal in case of rape or incest?
Hey, considering you believe so strongly in your pro-life nonsense, wouldn't it make sense to put the time and effort into proper grammar and punctuation?
Ok, here is MY little scenario.
The mother wants an abortion, but due to new laws I am making up for a hypothetical purpose she cannot have one. She is now forced to raise a child possibly by herself, and probably into poverty as most people who get abortions aren't rich. The mother is now being over worked and over stressed because she has to work 3 jobs to support a kid she doesn't even love. As a result she has a breakdown and decides to kill her child, and maybe herself.
Oh and by the way, you would never be a doctor as you apparently have the mental capacity of a grapefruit.
Cheap shot.
A provocative one-liner followed by a less than subtle anti-abortion pitch.
I hold no moral judgment over the whole abortion issue.
But if you were carrying the child of the man that raped you, to have to continue your life looking for and caring for the constant reminder of the evil deed that was perpetrated upon you, would you perhaps regard the subject of debate in a different light?
Not that I would wish it on you.
So you would condemn some one to carry a baby that was created by two of the most horrible actions that can happen to a woman?? Have you ever thought about how you would feel if you had to carry the baby of the man who raped you?? Have you ever gotten pregnant by mistake and it does happen even with women who are taking precautions. It happened to me and though I choose to carry the child who's now 15 I can't make that decision for everyone. Most of the reasons that people object to abortions is because there aren't enough white babies for all of the parents who want to adopt. If people who say that they are anti-abortion really feel that way than why don't' they adopt the babies that have disabilities or the ones who's parents carried them but now they don't want them but who are children of color.? There are thousands of children here in the states who need homes don't talk to me about abortions until you give homes to the one already here who don' t have them. When you do that than maybe I'll listen to you about abortion.
Perhaps you should ask the unwanted children who are physically and emotionally abused by parents who don't believe in abortion.
#1: It is not a ';baby'; untill it breathes on its own. Those fetal lifeforms are the responsibility of the person who's body surrounds them. NOT for you to say.
Why do you think discussing the sex lives of other people is acceptable politics?
Your question doesn't match your details.
Women fight for abortion to be legal in case of rape of incest because:
It's hard to love a child born from an illegal and emotionally scarring sexual assault. Having your DNA mingled with the DNA of someone that would rape , you'd wonder what traits got passed on to the kid as well. Every time you'd look at the kid, you'd remember the assault. You'd end up resenting a child that did nothing bad to you and it's not fair to the child.
In the case of incest, besides what I stated above, chances are that the child will be mentally or physically handicapped. If you were a woman raped by her father, would you want a mentally challenged reminder of the rape? Would you want your own father listed on the birth certificate of your child as the father of the child? Yeah, not likely.
I do agree that in OTHER cases, it'd be a lot better to prevent the pregnancy. Contraceptives aren't 100% effective though.
Regardless of how rare it is, people fight for abortion to be legal in cases of rape and incest because they don't believe anyone should be forced to have a child who is either inbred or one that they in no way participated in creating.
I think the decision to abort is a very personal one that should be left up to the pregnant woman (until such time as the child is able to physically survive independent of its mother). I don't think the state forcing women to continue pregnancies they do not want to continue would be of great benefit to society as a whole.
Yes, it is true that often people take foolish risks and then abort when they end up pregnant. Should pregnancy then be a punishment that we force on people for making bad decisions? If you would deny an abortion to a woman simply because she knew the risks of getting pregnant when she chose to have sex, would you also deny cosmetic surgery to a person who caused a car crash (maybe they'd been drinking!) and subsequently ended up disfigured, because they knew the risks of being disfigured by a car crash when they chose to get behind the wheel?
And what is the justification for outlawing the abortion of a very undeveloped, wholly dependent clump of human cells while allowing the wholesale slaughter of cows and pigs (which surely have much more capacity for independence, feeling and intelligence than a 6 week old human embryo)?
Have you ever been a victim of rape or incest?
Have worked closely with children who have been victims of both.
Witnessing the total psychological and emotional damages rape and incest has brought to these young people, then my answer is very clearly yes abortion should be there as an option for these young folk.
Cause its a traumatizing experience, and having the baby will be a reminder of it. Even having to carry it for 9months would be really hard, specially if they're young, or the rapist was a family member.
it might just 3 percent but that 3 percent still are women who had to suffer through such trauma.
no matter how small the amount of women they're still human being, they're someone's mom, sister, cousin, friend, fiance, etc.
Abortion is sometimes good, and should be legal. If the mom isn't ready to have a baby she shouldnt have it, although is really messed up that they didnt think bout the consequences and now have to kill a baby..
its even more messed for the kid to be born to a women who didn't want him/her in the first place.
or if the mom is a drug addict, the baby will be born with complications, even addicted to it mom's drug.
no child should go thru that.
the kid would feel neglect as well..
if its given up for adoption, by the time it gets adopted the kid will have to leave in foster homes, and that has to make them feel bad.
not only that but most kids who are born to parents who didnt want them have behaviorable problems, which will just get them in trouble in the future. may even end up in jail.
i know its not the same for every kid who wasn't aborted but I would rather not take the chance.
I fully agree with you about responsibility, but sometimes it is really in the kids best interest. Don't you know some people who really shouldn't be parents. While I don't agree absolutly with abortion just because it is more convienent, it really depends on the woman's situation, not just how the baby was conceived. What I think should happen is that the baby should be given up for adoption when born. But what happens if the mother doesn't take care of herself while pregnant? Should the baby be born with a crack addiction just because the mother is an asshole? And there's always the chance that instinct will kick in and the mother won't give the baby up, even though she is incapable of raising it properly. The baby shouldn't be punished for it's mother's stupidity, but that might mean never having to suffer for it to begin with
Anyone with legal knowledge about criminal cases please help!!!!!!.?
my boyfriend is in jail for something he did not do but im sure thats a cliche saying. im saying that because they have no evidence at all against him and the witnesses the DA say they have has NEVERED showed up to court. what kind of penal code should be filed in order to win his freedom.Anyone with legal knowledge about criminal cases please help!!!!!!.?
It's a little hard to understand your question. It looks like your boyfriend was arrested for the commission of a crime, and remanded to jail pending trial because he was unable to make bail and the crime was serious enough that he could not be released on his own recognizance.
If he has a public defender appointed, his parents should be asking this person about helping him file a writ of habeas corpus Your boyfriend would have to show that there is a legal or factual error of the court that resulted in him being jailed pending trial. If he can show that the prosecutor's case isn't strong enough to warrant his pretrial detention, then he may be able to be released.
I don't care whether he's an adult or not. Parents should NEVER stop being parents, unless of course, they are deceased. He needs family now to take up for him, if what you say is true and he's been unjustly accused.Anyone with legal knowledge about criminal cases please help!!!!!!.?
Since he has already been arrested and thrown in jail, I would suggest hiring a lawyer to help you with this matter. You will need to look for a ';defense lawyer'; that practices in any type of criminal matters or wrongful arrests. There are a lot of details missing from your question, as to what has happened, therefore I can only recommend you find an attorney and give him the details of the case, to see what he can do for you. Good luck.
so he is guilty.....the DA would never bring it to court without evidence....i bet the bum is lying to you
He isn't in jail with no evidence against him. The fact that the witnesses have not showed up for court doesn't mean there is no evidence.
He should have a lawyer helping him with his case. The lawyer will file any necessary and appropriate motions.
He was arrested for something..however if the DA can't prove the crime beyond a reasonable doubt then he'll have to be released. His attorney should file I think they call it a motion to dismiss. If they have no evidence and no witnesses then they pretty much don't have a case. What is he in for??
It's a little hard to understand your question. It looks like your boyfriend was arrested for the commission of a crime, and remanded to jail pending trial because he was unable to make bail and the crime was serious enough that he could not be released on his own recognizance.
If he has a public defender appointed, his parents should be asking this person about helping him file a writ of habeas corpus Your boyfriend would have to show that there is a legal or factual error of the court that resulted in him being jailed pending trial. If he can show that the prosecutor's case isn't strong enough to warrant his pretrial detention, then he may be able to be released.
I don't care whether he's an adult or not. Parents should NEVER stop being parents, unless of course, they are deceased. He needs family now to take up for him, if what you say is true and he's been unjustly accused.Anyone with legal knowledge about criminal cases please help!!!!!!.?
Since he has already been arrested and thrown in jail, I would suggest hiring a lawyer to help you with this matter. You will need to look for a ';defense lawyer'; that practices in any type of criminal matters or wrongful arrests. There are a lot of details missing from your question, as to what has happened, therefore I can only recommend you find an attorney and give him the details of the case, to see what he can do for you. Good luck.
so he is guilty.....the DA would never bring it to court without evidence....i bet the bum is lying to you
He isn't in jail with no evidence against him. The fact that the witnesses have not showed up for court doesn't mean there is no evidence.
He should have a lawyer helping him with his case. The lawyer will file any necessary and appropriate motions.
He was arrested for something..however if the DA can't prove the crime beyond a reasonable doubt then he'll have to be released. His attorney should file I think they call it a motion to dismiss. If they have no evidence and no witnesses then they pretty much don't have a case. What is he in for??
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)